Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://appdot.net/@joshuafoust" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>joshuafoust</span></a></span> infavt, <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SpaceX" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SpaceX</span></a>, (like the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Hyperloop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Hyperloop</span></a>,) is merely good ad <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FUD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FUD</span></a>'ding investments into <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Infrastruvture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Infrastruvture</span></a> like (<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PublicTransport" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PublicTransport</span></a> and) <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Fiber" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fiber</span></a>, because even cheap-ass equipment cobbled together from <a href="https://fs.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">fs.com</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> can provide cheaper and faster connectivity in most cases by virtue of <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FTTB" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FTTB</span></a> / <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/FTTH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FTTH</span></a> being inherently faster, lower latency and cheaper to maintain...</p><ul><li>Shure installing a fiber line may cost a bit, but like electrical and phone cables, they can be mounted on poles (aka. <em>"aerial cable"</em> amd aside from splicing and bending radii, have not that many concerns attached to them).</li></ul><p>Plus fiber is way more energy-saving, fobust against <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RainFade" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RainFade</span></a> and doesn't rely on <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/proprietary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>proprietary</span></a> & expensive <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/SATCOM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SATCOM</span></a> hardware on the customers' ends...</p><ul><li>Imagine how many kilometers of fiber could've been laid with the same budget, regardless if money, personnel hours or CO2 compared to launching megavonstellations that are so low in their orbits that they barely last years at best...</li></ul>