JWcph, Radicalized By Decency<p>"Neither the 2013 study nor its 2023 successor based their projections on empirical investigations of real workplaces, workers, or production processes. Instead, both relied on the subjective judgments of computer scientists and economists, who were asked to guess whether certain tasks could, in principle, be performed by machines..." </p><p>We're being asked to stake the future on unqualified & wildly biased guessing. It's fucking insane. </p><p><a href="https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/114657956519587325" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">tldr.nettime.org/@tante/114657</span><span class="invisible">956519587325</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://helvede.net/tags/tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>tech</span></a></p>