shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

286
active users

#neuroethics

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Announcing an upcoming panel on probably the most active controversy in #bioethics that people outside medicine (and many within) haven't heard of, #ta-NRP for #organdonation. (We're facing decisions about this at #UCSF and many other hospitals are also considering their policies.) This is a method for increasing the quantity and quality of organs available for transplantation, but which many critics believe violates the dead donor rule. In ta-NRP circulatory death of the donor is declared, after which perfusion is restored to thoracic and abdominal organs while brain perfusion is (we think) surgically prevented. Ta-NRP is performed in Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France, and in some centers in the US; is contrary to guidelines in Canada, Australia, and NZ; and has been paused in Belgium and the UK pending further study.

At #Neuroethics2025 in Munich next month we'll host a panel, International Controversies over ta-NRP for Organ Procurement: Brain Perfusion and the Dead Donor Rule, including panelists to share key perspectives from three countries where ta-NRP has been performed, critiquing different conceptions of the role of the brain in circulatory death and how national professional and public norms affect views of this procedure:

  • Karola Kreitmair (Univ. of Wisconsin, US) is a philosopher whose work addresses philosophical arguments regarding ta-NRP and the dead donor rule.
  • Amelia Hessheimer (Hosp. Univ. La Paz, Spain) is a transplant surgeon and co-author of the European Society for Organ Transplantation's consensus statement on NRP.
  • Alex Manara (N. Bristol NHS Trust, UK) is an intensivist and author of an influential early analysis on ta-NRP and the dead donor rule.

neuroethicssociety.org/posts/i #neuroethics

neuroethicssociety.orgInternational Controversies over ta-NRP for Organ Procurement: Brain Perfusion and the Dead Donor RuleNeuroethics 2025Full scheduleRegistration This panel will explore experiences of and concerns about Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (ta-NRP) in different cultural and legal contexts. Experts will identify and critique different conceptions of the role of the brain in informing perspectives on the permissibility of ta-NRP, as well as discuss how national professional and public norms around ... International Controversies over ta-NRP for Organ Procurement: Brain Perfusion and the Dead Donor Rule

Calling all middle school STEM teachers in the NYC area! Applications are open for the 2025 winter cohort for the Teacher Institute for Neuroscience and Society. This program gives teachers an opportunity to deepen their neuroscience knowledge and co-create curricula to help middle school students tackle big questions at the intersection of science and society. Applications are due Nov 1. #neurosociety #neuroethics #stem #stemeducation #stemteachers

dana.org/article/open-call-tea

Dana FoundationOpen Call: Teacher Institute for Neuroscience and Society

“The convergence of neuroscience, neurotechnology, and AI, and the deployment of AI-assisted neurotechnologies in different parts of the world makes identification and understanding of cultural assumptions and framings particularly relevant.” BMC Neurosci (Aug 29, 2024)

bmcneurosci.biomedcentral.com/

BioMed CentralNeuroethics and AI ethics: a proposal for collaboration - BMC NeuroscienceThe scientific relationship between neuroscience and artificial intelligence is generally acknowledged, and the role that their long history of collaboration has played in advancing both fields is often emphasized. Beyond the important scientific insights provided by their collaborative development, both neuroscience and AI raise a number of ethical issues that are generally explored by neuroethics and AI ethics. Neuroethics and AI ethics have been gaining prominence in the last few decades, and they are typically carried out by different research communities. However, considering the evolving landscape of AI-assisted neurotechnologies and the various conceptual and practical intersections between AI and neuroscience—such as the increasing application of AI in neuroscientific research, the healthcare of neurological and mental diseases, and the use of neuroscientific knowledge as inspiration for AI—some scholars are now calling for a collaborative relationship between these two domains. This article seeks to explore how a collaborative relationship between neuroethics and AI ethics can stimulate theoretical and, ideally, governance efforts. First, we offer some reasons for calling for the collaboration of the ethical reflection on neuroscientific innovations and AI. Next, we explore some dimensions that we think could be enhanced by the cross-fertilization between these two subfields of ethics. We believe that considering the pace and increasing fusion of neuroscience and AI in the development of innovations, broad and underspecified calls for responsibility that do not consider insights from different ethics subfields will only be partially successful in promoting meaningful changes in both research and applications.

"If you take it for granted that nobody can listen in on your innermost thoughts, I regret to inform you that your brain may not be private much longer. Luckily, the brain is lawyering up." Colorado passed legislation to prevent companies from selling your brainwaves. But is it enough to stop the likes of Meta and Apple?

Story by Sigal Samuel re: #neurorights #neurotech #neuroethics #neuroscience #neurology #neurotechnology #ethics #technology

vox.com/future-perfect/2407851

Vox · Colorado brain data bill: How a new law will protect the privacy of our thoughtsBy Sigal Samuel

New informative article re: #neurotech #neuroethics #BCI #AI. Worth a read. "Developer perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study."
Nature (4/3/2024)

nature.com/articles/s41598-024

NatureDeveloper perspectives on the ethics of AI-driven neural implants: a qualitative study - Scientific ReportsConvergence of neural implants with artificial intelligence (AI) presents opportunities for the development of novel neural implants and improvement of existing neurotechnologies. While such technological innovation carries great promise for the restoration of neurological functions, they also raise ethical challenges. Developers of AI-driven neural implants possess valuable knowledge on the possibilities, limitations and challenges raised by these innovations; yet their perspectives are underrepresented in academic literature. This study aims to explore perspectives of developers of neurotechnology to outline ethical implications of three AI-driven neural implants: a cochlear implant, a visual neural implant, and a motor intention decoding speech-brain-computer-interface. We conducted semi-structured focus groups with developers (n = 19) of AI-driven neural implants. Respondents shared ethically relevant considerations about AI-driven neural implants that we clustered into three themes: (1) design aspects; (2) challenges in clinical trials; (3) impact on users and society. Developers considered accuracy and reliability of AI-driven neural implants conditional for users’ safety, authenticity, and mental privacy. These needs were magnified by the convergence with AI. Yet, the need for accuracy and reliability may also conflict with potential benefits of AI in terms of efficiency and complex data interpretation. We discuss strategies to mitigate these challenges.

"Once we begin to think theologically about the devices we are already wearing on our bodies, maybe we will be better prepared to ask far bigger and harder questions—like what it might mean to implant devices in our brains that help us become one with #AI."

#BCI #neurotechnology #ethics #neuroethics christianitytoday.com/ct/2024/

Christianity Today · Neural Implants: Should We Become One with AI?By A. Trevor Sutton
Replied in thread

Thanks for sharing our still-premiering “Beginner’s Guide To Neural Mechanisms” video series, @Lupposofi!

Here’s the playlist on #YouTube in case that helps anyone navigate the videos: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZn

Many thanks to those who have started providing transcripts in languages besides English!

YouTubeA Beginner's Guide To Neural MechanismsEasy-to-understand introductions to neuroscience and philosophy from experts in the field for students and lifelong learners. To learn more about the project...

🧠😇 Our next 5 videos in the Beginner’s Guide to Neural Mechanisms are here!

Dr. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong reviews neuroscience of psychopathy, self control, and moral responsibility.

He also gets into the ethics of (seeming) consciousness in vegetative states.

philosophyofbrains.com/2023/10

The Brains Blog · Neuroscience & Morality — Five VideosDr. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong explains how neuroscience and morality intersect.

What would you do with a neural implant?

Me? I'd like a #secure implant would alleviate my #anxiety & #depression, without the risk of hackers changing the files in my brain. Is that too much to ask? #mentalhealth #biotech #bioethics #neuroscience #neuralimplants #infosec #neuroethics

On a less serious note, I'd use it to write faster, and edit flawlessly. Think of all the books I'd finish! #creativity #writingcommunity

I write #cyberpunk #scifi #horror about hackable brain implants & power-hungry villains. Elon Musk's #Neuralink hits too close to home for me.

I'm fascinated by #transhumanism, fully aware that I'm practically a cyborg due to my ever-present smartphone which basically functions as an appendage.

I'm also an editor w/ experience in #publishing. Most recent editing project was an alien scifi spicy romance. Cool stuff.

Also #neuroethics #cybersecurity #infosec #biotech

And #coffee.

Reposting to new instance:

#introduction : I'm a #neurologist, cognitive neuroscientist & ethicist at @UCSF. I care for people with #dementia + other cognitive disorders and I do research on #decision making, #neuroethics, #neurotech.

I trained for my MD here at #UCSF and my PhD in #philosophy at #NYU. I'm director of #bioethics at UCSF. #interdisciplinary

Personal: Dad to 2 teen boys + a #chihuahua + a #corgi. Family background Hokkien Sino-Burmese, 🇲🇰 by 👰🤵. #NBA, history podcasts, food, #SFGiants, 90s #hiphop.