Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

258
active users

shakedown.social: AboutStatusProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.7

#repository

2 posts2 participants0 posts today
Public
George Macgregor

"neither Mendeley nor EndNote’s App functions recognized dataset DOIs" ...which is rather astonishing, for 'in-app' #DOI look-ups. #Zotero, #Paperpile & #Sciwheel are at least at the forefront though more to be done.

I would comment that analysis of 'plugin' import of #dataset metadata into ref managers more complex to understand; highly dependent on the structured data exposed by host #repository.

Obstacles to Dataset Citation Using #Bibliographic Management Software doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2025-017

thumbnail image
Data Science JournalObstacles to Dataset Citation Using Bibliographic Management Software | Data Science Journal
Public *
George Macgregor

I am delighted to announce our Digital Library team is seeking a 'Digital Library Systems Developer'. Yay! Come work with us -- exciting work / projects beckon within the #digitallibrary, #repository, cultural #hertiage, and #DigitalHumanities space!!

Details in the link below. Deadline for applications 04 June. Feel free to direct message with informal enquiries.

jobs.gla.ac.uk/job/digital-lib #GLAMR #developer #WebDevelopment #LibraryTech #CulturalHeritageTech #LAMPStack #FOSS #Glasgow #TechJobs

www.jobs.gla.ac.ukDigital Library Systems Developer · University of GlasgowJob PurposeThe Digital Library Team within Information Services at the University of Glasgow supports digital access to globally significant research collect...
Public
alxd ✏️ solarpunk prompts

I would like to upload the code to storyseedlibrary.org/ Solarpunk art library publicly and accept Pull Requests with any suggestions / submissions people have.

The repository is roughly ~200 MB, can grow up to ~500 in the future.

What would be the best platform to do it, balancing Solarpunk's #floss philosophy with user-friendliness?

· 31 people · Closed
Story Seed LibraryWelcome to Story Seed Library!A library of Solarpunk art and story seeds helping you imagine a better climate future!
#repository#git#github
Public *
arabiccola

In an interdisciplinary Masters-level class at RWTH Aachen, I taught construction, architecture, mechanical and other students how to clone and run Python/NodeJS repositories from GitHub.

One of the projects was based on using a music visualiser to create music animations. At this link, you can find what the students created: diraneyya.github.io/deep-music

Deep Music Visualizer ShowdownDeep Music Visualizer ShowdownWhat is this all about This website was setup in under 30 minutes using the HUGO project template on GitLab. The website provides a showdown of all the visualizations created by the DSSIPD WiSe 2021/2022 students in the CR-Masters program in the RWTH Aachen university.
#teaching#github#gitlab
Continued thread
Public
petersuber

Update. Bad news from the #NEH for #KnowledgeCommons (and the rest of us).
about.hcommons.org/2025/04/17/

"On April 2, 2025, we received notification that our NEH Infrastructure and Capacity Building Challenge Grant, awarded in 2020, was terminated effective immediately…On April 10, 2025, we received further…notification that our contract to provide the NEH’s Designated Public-Access #Repository was also being terminated…This loss is devastating…both for the financial impact it represents…but also for the unceremonious end to a goal we’d set for ourselves years ago…Not to mention the bigger picture here: that designated public-access repository is no longer needed, because it is assumed that the NEH will no longer be funding research, and thus there will be no results of research to make publicly accessible."

PS: All the agencies covered by the #OSTP #NelsonMemo must designate #OpenAccess repositories for their OA content. NEH was the only agency to designate a repo not hosted by the govt. All the other agency repos will be hosted by the govt, where they will be subject to political censorship or takedowns.

#Censorship#DefendResearch#GreenOA
Public
Donald Hobern

The #data team I lead for the #Australian Plant Phenomics Network (plantphenomics.org/) is seeking two additional #Python #developers as part of our efforts to build end-to-end pipelines for #FAIR #research data.

One will focus on interfaces between our nodes and #S3 #repository storage at #Pawsey and #NCI.

The other will build tools to help nodes package complex data using RO-Crate.

The preferred location is Adelaide.

careers.adelaide.edu.au/cw/en/

careers.adelaide.edu.au/cw/en/

Please boost.

Australian Plant Phenomics NetworkHomeAPPN is Australia’s network of National Research Infrastructures for plant and agricultural science.
Public
n_to

Wer #Arch-#Linux benutzt und sich seit ein paar Tagen wundert, warum soviele #Repository auf #404 laufen: Vor 2 Jahren wurden die Community-Repos mit den Extra-Repos gemerged, aber aus legacy-Gründen noch ein wenig beibehalten. Jetzt ist die Frist abgelaufen und die nun weggefallenen Community-Repos erzeugen diesen Fehler. Einfach auskommentieren, wie hier beschrieben: forum.endeavouros.com/t/never-

EndeavourOS · Never seen this many servers fail on an update before!Synchronizing package databases... endeavouros is up to date core is up to date extra is up to date community.db failed to download multilib is up to date error: failed retrieving file 'community.db' from losangeles.mirror.pkgbuild.com : The requested URL returned error: 404 error: failed retrieving file 'community.db' from america.mirror.pkgbuild.com : The requested URL returned error: 404 error: failed retrieving file 'community.db' from us.arch.niranjan.co : The requested URL returned e...
Public *
petersuber

New study: "Despite having a #repository mandate since 2016, #NSF #compliance rates remain low."
iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/a

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly CommunicationOpen But Hidden: Open Access Gaps in the National Science Foundation Public Access RepositoryIntroduction: In 2022, the U.S. government released new guidelines for making publicly funded research open and available. For the National Science Foundation (NSF), these policies reinforce requirements in place since 2016 for supported research to be submitted to the Public Access Repository (PAR). Methods: To evaluate the public access compliance of research articles submitted to the NSF-PAR, this study searched for NSF-PAR records published between 2017 and 2021 from two research intensive institutions. Records were reviewed to determine whether the PAR held a deposited copy, as required by the 2016 policies, or provided a link out to publisher-held version(s). Results: A total of 841 unique records were identified, all with publicly accessible versions. Yet only 42% had a deposited PDF version available in the repository as required by the NSF 2016 Public Access Policy. The remaining 58% directed instead to publisher-held versions. In total, only 55% of record links labeled “Full Text Available” directed users to a publicly accessible version with a single click. Discussion: Records within PAR do not clearly direct users to the publicly accessible full text. In almost half of records, the most prominently displayed link directed users to a paywall version, even when a publicly available version existed. Records accessible only through the CHORUS (Clearing House for the Open Research of the United States) initiative were further obscured by requiring specialized navigation of publisher-owned sites. Conclusion: Despite having a repository mandate since 2016, NSF compliance rates remain low. Additional support and/or oversight is needed to address the additional requirements introduced under the 2022 memo.
#GreenOA#OAintheUSA#OpenAccess
Public
petersuber

New study: "We find that the early release of a publication as a #preprint correlates with a significant positive citation advantage of about 20.2% (±.7) on average. We also find that sharing #data in an online #repository correlates with a smaller yet still positive citation advantage of 4.3% (±.8) on average. However, we do not find a significant citation advantage for sharing #code."
journals.plos.org/plosone/arti

journals.plos.orgAn analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citationsCalls to make scientific research more open have gained traction with a range of societal stakeholders. Open Science practices include but are not limited to the early sharing of results via preprints and openly sharing outputs such as data and code to make research more reproducible and extensible. Existing evidence shows that adopting Open Science practices has effects in several domains. In this study, we investigate whether adopting one or more Open Science practices leads to significantly higher citations for an associated publication, which is one form of academic impact. We use a novel dataset known as Open Science Indicators, produced by PLOS and DataSeer, which includes all PLOS publications from 2018 to 2023 as well as a comparison group sampled from the PMC Open Access Subset. In total, we analyze circa 122’000 publications. We calculate publication and author-level citation indicators and use a broad set of control variables to isolate the effect of Open Science Indicators on received citations. We show that Open Science practices are adopted to different degrees across scientific disciplines. We find that the early release of a publication as a preprint correlates with a significant positive citation advantage of about 20.2% (±.7) on average. We also find that sharing data in an online repository correlates with a smaller yet still positive citation advantage of 4.3% (±.8) on average. However, we do not find a significant citation advantage for sharing code. Further research is needed on additional or alternative measures of impact beyond citations. Our results are likely to be of interest to researchers, as well as publishers, research funders, and policymakers.
#Citations#OACA#OpenAccessCitationAdvantage
ExploreLive feeds
About