shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

262
active users

#greenOA

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
petersuber<p>3/ The <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NIH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NIH</span></a> policy is all-green (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a>). It requires deposit in an OA repository, PubMed Central (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PMC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PMC</span></a>). It does not require publishing in an OA journal.</p><p>If you're an NIH-funded author and a journal tells you that you must pay an <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a> to comply with the policy, it's lying. Compliance with the policy is free of charge. If a journal asks you to pay an APC, it's only to publish in that particular journal. Consider taking your submission elsewhere.</p>
petersuber<p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SPARC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SPARC</span></a> has released its own new info on the new <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NIH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NIH</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> policy.<br><a href="https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Update-to-NIH-PA-Policy-Deadline.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploa</span><span class="invisible">ds/2025/06/Update-to-NIH-PA-Policy-Deadline.pdf</span></a></p><p>Excerpt:</p><p>&lt;blockquote&gt;<br>● The Policy requires immediate public access to articles -- <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/embargoes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>embargoes</span></a> are no longer allowed.<br>● NIH reiterates authors do not have to pay a fee to comply with the Policy.<br>● The Policy applies to manuscripts accepted for publication on or after July 1, 2025. This means the Policy will apply to existing grants if an article is accepted on or after that date.<br>● The Policy requires that final peer-reviewed manuscripts be submitted to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PubMedCentral" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PubMedCentral</span></a> (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PMC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PMC</span></a>) upon acceptance to be made publicly available immediately upon publication.<br>● The Policy requires that grantees explicitly grant the NIH the right to make the manuscript available in PMC without an embargo.<br>● The Policy does not explicitly grant full reuse rights of the manuscript to the public.<br>&lt;/blockquote&gt; </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Embargoes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Embargoes</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Medicine</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NelsonMemo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NelsonMemo</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OSTP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OSTP</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>The <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NIH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NIH</span></a> just released new info on its zero-embargo <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> policy, which takes effect next week (July 1).<br><a href="https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">grants.nih.gov/policy-and-comp</span><span class="invisible">liance/policy-topics/public-access</span></a></p><p>This includes:</p><p>* a new overview of the policy itself<br><a href="https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access/nih-public-access-policy-overview" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">grants.nih.gov/policy-and-comp</span><span class="invisible">liance/policy-topics/public-access/nih-public-access-policy-overview</span></a></p><p>* a new overview of the methods for submitting papers to comply with the policy<br><a href="https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/public-access/submitting-pubmed-central" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">grants.nih.gov/policy-and-comp</span><span class="invisible">liance/policy-topics/public-access/submitting-pubmed-central</span></a></p><p>* and a new FAQ.<br><a href="https://grants.nih.gov/faqs#/public-access-policy" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">grants.nih.gov/faqs#/public-ac</span><span class="invisible">cess-policy</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Embargoes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Embargoes</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Medicine</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NelsonMemo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NelsonMemo</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PubMedCentral" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PubMedCentral</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OSTP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OSTP</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>The Royal Society of Chemistry (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/RSC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RSC</span></a>) just issued a vague and puzzling statement about its plans. <br><a href="https://www.rsc.org/news/our-evolving-approach-to-open-access" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">rsc.org/news/our-evolving-appr</span><span class="invisible">oach-to-open-access</span></a></p><p>It once planned to convert all its journals to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> by 2028. By which it apparently meant <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>-based OA. But after talking with customers in different parts of the world, it learned that some regions "are not yet ready for fully OA." By which it means APC-based OA. "The resounding message we heard over and over is that one size cannot fit all." By which it means that not all can pay APCs. </p><p>"It became clear that we needed to adapt our vision for openness to account for a landscape that is increasing in complexity and no longer coalescing around a single direction for open research." As if the global landscape had ever coalesced around support for APCs. </p><p>But RSC is still committed to some kind of transition to OA. "We are now shaping our future OA approach to support authors in ways that suit them best in a local context." </p><p>If it plans to support no-APC forms of OA, it carefully avoids saying so. It never mentions <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> and never endorses <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a>. (It mentions one diamond OA initiative in Africa, but it's not an RSC initiative.)</p><p>I'm guessing that it plans to rely on locally customized <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReadAndPublish" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ReadAndPublish</span></a> agreements. (I've argued that all such agreements use APCs in disguise.) But if so, why not say so? If it has other models in mind for regions "not ready" for APC-based OA, why not say what they are? </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/South" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>South</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>New study: "<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> via <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a> (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a>) correlates with higher citation counts and a lower probability of zero citations. In contrast, OA via the publisher's website without an explicit <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenLicense" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenLicense</span></a> (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/BronzeOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BronzeOA</span></a>) is associated with higher citation counts but also with a higher probability of zero citations."<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15384v1" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">arxiv.org/abs/2505.15384v1</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Citations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Citations</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LibreOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LibreOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OACA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OACA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccessCitationAdvantage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccessCitationAdvantage</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Bad news from the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NEH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NEH</span></a> for <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/KnowledgeCommons" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>KnowledgeCommons</span></a> (and the rest of us).<br><a href="https://about.hcommons.org/2025/04/17/on-the-neh-and-our-path-forward/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">about.hcommons.org/2025/04/17/</span><span class="invisible">on-the-neh-and-our-path-forward/</span></a></p><p>"On April 2, 2025, we received notification that our NEH Infrastructure and Capacity Building Challenge Grant, awarded in 2020, was terminated effective immediately…On April 10, 2025, we received further…notification that our contract to provide the NEH’s Designated Public-Access <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Repository" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Repository</span></a> was also being terminated…This loss is devastating…both for the financial impact it represents…but also for the unceremonious end to a goal we’d set for ourselves years ago…Not to mention the bigger picture here: that designated public-access repository is no longer needed, because it is assumed that the NEH will no longer be funding research, and thus there will be no results of research to make publicly accessible."</p><p>PS: All the agencies covered by the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OSTP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OSTP</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NelsonMemo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NelsonMemo</span></a> must designate <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> repositories for their OA content. NEH was the only agency to designate a repo not hosted by the govt. All the other agency repos will be hosted by the govt, where they will be subject to political censorship or takedowns.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Censorship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Censorship</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DefendResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DefendResearch</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Takedowns" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Takedowns</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/USPol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>USPol</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/USPolitics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>USPolitics</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Here's another piece that made it through peer review (at Oxford UP) falsely assuming that all <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journals charge <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a>. <br><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf092" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf092</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>The author concludes that there is *not* too much OA, but only because APC discounts and waivers exist. Imagine how much she could have strengthened her argument by bringing in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a> and <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Here's another unrefereed letter to the editor (this time at Physics Today) falsely asserting that all <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journals charge <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a>, effectively denying the existence and prevalence of no-APC OA (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a>) journals , and failing to acknowledge the existence of OA repositories (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a>).<br><a href="https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/78/3/8/3337073/Open-access-for-reading-or-closed-access-for" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/78/3/8/3337073/Open-access-for-reading-or-closed-access-for</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Here's an unrefereed letter to the editor leaving the false impression that the UK <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/REF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>REF</span></a> requires researchers to publish in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>-based <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journals. (It doesn't require publishing in OA journals; authors may choose <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> instead; and when they do choose to publish in OA journals, they are free to choose no-APC or <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a> journals.) <br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-025-8398-8" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/s41415-025</span><span class="invisible">-8398-8</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Kudos to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Canada" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Canada</span></a>'s three major research-funding agencies for their draft all-green, zero-embargo, rights-retention <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> policy.<br><a href="https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/open-access/draft-revised-tri-agency-open-access-policy-publications" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">science.gc.ca/site/science/en/</span><span class="invisible">interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/open-access/draft-revised-tri-agency-open-access-policy-publications</span></a></p><p>The agencies are the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/CIHR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CIHR</span></a>), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NSERC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NSERC</span></a>) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SSHRC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SSHRC</span></a>) — sometimes known collectively as the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/TriAgency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TriAgency</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Embargoes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Embargoes</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenLicenses" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenLicenses</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/RightsRetention" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RightsRetention</span></a></p>
petersuber<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://neuromatch.social/@neuralreckoning" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>neuralreckoning</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.archive.org/@internetarchive" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>internetarchive</span></a></span> <br>Sorry if you already know this. The <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NelsonMemo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NelsonMemo</span></a> described <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> policies. It required deposit in OA <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a>, not submission to OA <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/journals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>journals</span></a>. Some publishers told authors that they'd have to pay <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a> to comply with the policy. But that was deception and spin. Compliance with the policy was always free of charge. When journals charge APCs to publish fed-funded research, it was to publish in those journals, not to comply with federal policy.</p>
petersuber<p>New study: "Despite having a <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repository" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repository</span></a> mandate since 2016, <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NSF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NSF</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/compliance" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>compliance</span></a> rates remain low."<br><a href="https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/17767/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/a</span><span class="invisible">rticle/id/17767/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OAintheUSA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OAintheUSA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Good news from the US Repository Network (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/USRN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>USRN</span></a>): <br><a href="https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Outcomes-of-the-USRN-Discovery-Pilot-Project.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploa</span><span class="invisible">ds/2023/12/Outcomes-of-the-USRN-Discovery-Pilot-Project.pdf</span></a></p><p>"At the beginning of the project, about half of the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a> did not have their <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OAIPMH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OAIPMH</span></a> interface properly configured and, therefore, could not be indexed by external discovery systems. After just over a year of the pilot, all but one repositories are now OAI-PMH compliant. This has resulted in a 50% increase in indexed content, with 728,770 new records now publicly accessible."</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>New study: In <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/chemistry" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>chemistry</span></a>, <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> articles "achieve higher levels of social media engagement and exhibit citation rates comparable to those of [<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/TollAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>TollAccess</span></a> articles], even when featured in journals with lower h-index scores, suggesting enhanced visibility and sustained readership."<br><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324001459" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sciencedirect.com/science/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/pii/S0099133324001459</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update with a comment.</p><p>Don't throw in the towel. First, reform research <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/assessment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>assessment</span></a> to move away from journal impact factors (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/JIFs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>JIFs</span></a>) and to pay more attention to the quality of research than the number of publications or where they published. Second, move away from <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a>. To make research <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a>, favor no-APC <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> and <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a> over APC-based varieties. </p><p>BTW, the Budapest Open Access Initiative 20th anniversary statement makes both these recommendations. (Disclosure: I was a co-author.)<br><a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">budapestopenaccessinitiative.o</span><span class="invisible">rg/boai20/</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/BOAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BOAI</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/BOAI20" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BOAI20</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>A recent survey of faculty at an R1 <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>university</span></a> (with most respondents from the social sciences) revealed strong objections to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APCs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>APCs</span></a> at <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/journals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>journals</span></a> and deep ignorance of OA <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a>. <br><a href="https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/17647/galley/16356/view/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/a</span><span class="invisible">rticle/17647/galley/16356/view/</span></a> </p><p>The survey did not ask whether respondents were familiar with no-APC (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a>) OA journals. </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GoldOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GoldOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Under the 2022 <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OSTP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OSTP</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NelsonMemo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NelsonMemo</span></a>, US federal funding agencies must make agency-funded research <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> in "agency-designated" <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a>. The same was true under the 2013 <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/HoldrenMemo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HoldrenMemo</span></a>. This is the first time that any federal agency has designated a repository neither built nor hosted by government agencies — an important milestone for <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a>. Kudos to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/KnowledgeCommons" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>KnowledgeCommons</span></a> (<span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hcommons.social/@hello" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>hello</span></a></span>).</p>
petersuber<p>New study: "Articles authored or co-authored by employees of the [US] National Cancer Institute [are in the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PublicDomain" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PublicDomain</span></a> but frequently] omit any assertion of public domain status, and…many of them remain inaccessible to the general public behind publisher firewalls. Medical institutional <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a> and libraries can play an important role in making this literature (both current and historical) more widely available."<br><a href="https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/mirl/2024/program/3/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">scholarlycommons.henryford.com</span><span class="invisible">/mirl/2024/program/3/</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Copyfraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyfraud</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Medicine</span></a></p>
petersuber<p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Elsevier" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Elsevier</span></a> acquired <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/bepress" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bepress</span></a> in 2017.<br><a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/elsevier-acquires-bepress-a-leading-service-provider-used-by-academic-institutions-to-showcase-their-research-638101803.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">prnewswire.com/news-releases/e</span><span class="invisible">lsevier-acquires-bepress-a-leading-service-provider-used-by-academic-institutions-to-showcase-their-research-638101803.html</span></a></p><p>That triggered a mini-movement — <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/beprexit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>beprexit</span></a> — of universities trying to migrate from bepress to other <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a>. <br><a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=beprexit" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">google.com/search?q=beprexit</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>A new study shows that "the total number of R1 and R2 bepress institutions grew from 76 in 2017 to 90 in 2019, followed by declines to 86 in 2021 and 82 in 2023. From 2017 to 2023, 15 R1 or R2 institutions were observed leaving bepress, and 12 joined." <br><a href="https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/17786/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/a</span><span class="invisible">rticle/id/17786/</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>This is an important step in adding new layers of utility to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/repositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>repositories</span></a>.<br><a href="https://coar-repositories.org/news-updates/coar-notify-functionality-now-available-to-dspace-users/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">coar-repositories.org/news-upd</span><span class="invisible">ates/coar-notify-functionality-now-available-to-dspace-users/</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/COAR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>COAR</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Dspace" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Dspace</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Infrastructure" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Infrastructure</span></a></p>