shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

269
active users

#observability

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

New Open-Source Tool Spotlight 🚨🚨🚨

Kubernetes History Inspector (KHI) is an agentless log viewer built for visualizing Kubernetes audit logs. Its timeline-based log analysis and resource relationship diagrams simplify cluster troubleshooting—no complex setups or commands required. #Kubernetes #Observability

🔗 Project link on #GitHub 👉 github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform

#Infosec #Cybersecurity #Software #Technology #News #CTF #Cybersecuritycareer #hacking #redteam #blueteam #purpleteam #tips #opensource #cloudsecurity

✨
🔐 P.S. Found this helpful? Tap Follow for more cybersecurity tips and insights! I share weekly content for professionals and people who want to get into cyber. Happy hacking 💻🏴‍☠️

Is Node.js the future of backend development, or just a beautifully wrapped grenade?

Lately, I see more and more backend systems, yes, even monoliths, built entirely in Node.js, sometimes with server-side rendering layered on top. These are not toy projects. These are services touching sensitive PII data, sometimes in regulated industries.

When I first used Node.js years ago, I remember:
• Security concepts were… let’s say aspirational.
• Licensing hell due to questionable npm dependencies.
• Tests were flaky, with mocking turning into dark rituals.
• Behavior of libraries changed weekly like socks, but more dangerous.
• Internet required to run a “local” build. How comforting.

Even with TypeScript, it all melts back into JavaScript at runtime, a language so flexible it can hang itself.

Sure, SSR and monoliths can simplify architecture. But they also widen the attack surface, especially when:
• The backend is non-compiled.
• Every endpoint is a potential open door.
• The system needs Node + a fleet of dependencies + a container + prayer just to run.

Compare that to a compiled, stateless binary that:
• Runs in a scratch container.
• Requires zero runtime dependencies.
• Has encryption at rest, in transit, and ideally per-user.
• Can be observed, scaled, audited, stateless and destroyed with precision.

I’ve shipped frontends that are static, CDN-delivered, secure by design, and light enough to fit on a floppy disk. By running them with Node, I’m loading gigabytes of unknown tooling to render “Hello, user”.

So I wonder:
Is this the future? Or am I just… old?

Are we replacing mature, scalable architectures with serverless spaghetti and 12-factor mayhem because “it works on Vercel”?

Tell me how you build secure, observable, compliant systems in Node.js.
Genuinely curious.
Mildly terrified and maybe old.

Man Prometheus is a pain to recover once its data store is in any way out of shape. Did NOT help that it was buried inside Kubernetes inside a PVC.

Thankfully it was only Dev environment today but if this ever pages on Prod we're losing data as it stands.

I'll write something up for a run book but eesh.

Announcing our new EU data region! 🇪🇺 🌍

If you want to use Honeybadger but must keep your data outside the U.S. (you know, for whatever reason) — this is for you.

Read the blog post, and/or stick around for the key takeaways. 🧵

honeybadger.io/blog/eu-data-re

Honeybadger Developer BlogHoneybadger’s EU data center is now generally available 🇪🇺You can now host your Honeybadger data outside the U.S. to meet EU data residency requirements.
Replied to paigerduty

@paigerduty Love it!!! And really nice because the postal service serves as a metaphor in many other cases, which benefits knowledge transfer!

So one that I like to use is to illustrate how we are more interested in useful dashboards than creating a dashboard(s) for everything.

We sometimes market this as "the single pane of glass solution". So I encourage people to think about a stained glass window instead.

Single panes of glass always look the same. Homogenous and uncolored from any angle or perspective, under most any light. Single panes of glass can be broken, they have no internal structure.

Stained Glass looks different if you change your perspective only slightly. Light is refracted in multiplicative ways through the different colors of glass. Different kinds of light have different shades and hues. Most importantly, stained glass pieces are deliberate, they depict something. These windows can only be broken in sections, which is a nice example of systems thinking as well!