shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

288
active users

#sustainability

57 posts50 participants8 posts today

#sustainability #ecology #nature #activism

'Join the Less Lawn, More Life 12-week challenge, a free online program to transform your lawn into an improved outdoor space and better habitat for birds, butterflies, and other beneficial insects.

Hosted by Plan it Wild in collaboration with 11 organizations (including Wild Ones, where I’m a member), Less Lawn, More Life launches May 1, 2025.'

lireo.com/less-lawn-more-life-

Lireo Designs - Thoughts on nature, gardening, writing, and technology · Less Lawn, More Life 2025 - Lireo DesignsJoin other gardeners in the United States for the Less Lawn, More Life free 12-week challenge to transform your lawn into natural habitat.

💁🏻‍♀️ ICYMI: 💧🔍 How does previously wasted water become clean drinking water? At the Orange County Water District, Dr. Megan Plumlee directs a groundwater replenishment system that provides 85% of local drinking #water for 2.5 million people.

Mission Unstoppable takes us behind the scenes where Plumlee, first inspired by her childhood microscope, now leads research scientists using advanced purification methods that require less energy than importing water from hundreds of miles away.

👉 Learn more: zurl.co/Ib340

17% of the Amazon rainforest is already gone. More than 10,000 species of animals and plants are at risk.

The Amazon is the largest and most important ecosystem on Earth, but it is disappearing quickly. As it vanishes, the planet loses a vital force that helps regulate climate and weather, putting all life at risk.

We can’t let this continue. It’s time to demand action.

🌿 Sign the petition now → act.gp/42w7CQc

Renters want to go green too. Why your landlord may not invest — and what you can do
In this week's issue of our environmental newsletter, we learn why landlords might not be investing in making buildings greener, and what tenants can do; follow a huge migration in the world of art an activism; and find out why fur may be making a comeback, thanks in part ...
#rent #landlord #environment #sustainability #News #Science
cbc.ca/news/science/what-on-ea

🏙️ Urbanism Now #15 is out! This week:

📊 Compare global mobility habits w/ Cities Moving
🤔 Debating China's ubiquitous red signs
🚆 Seattle housing: Data urges smarter density near transit
👵 Inclusive transit boosts seniors' health & connection
🌱 Rethinking sustainability beyond colonial bias
💨 VA mandates speed tech for high-speed offenders
Read the full newsletter now:
urbanismnow.substack.com/p/15-

💧🔍 How does previously wasted water become clean drinking water? At the Orange County Water District, Dr. Megan Plumlee directs a groundwater replenishment system that provides 85% of local drinking #water for 2.5 million people.

Mission Unstoppable takes us behind the scenes where Plumlee, first inspired by her childhood microscope, now leads research scientists using advanced purification methods that require less energy than importing water from hundreds of miles away.

👉 Learn more: zurl.co/Ib340

Replied in thread

@iFixit

for many decades digital gadgets were subject to "exponential" technology improvements that complicated the argument for long term use.

This is no longer the case.

Now the churn is purely a psychological consumption game, trying to turn these tools into "apparel" and fashion.

But there is another strong ally in the fight against #plannedobsolescence (besides #sustainability ):

People also like to learn and grow with their tools. Worn shoes are more comfortable than new ones.

@df

That piece on ethics of immigration was an interesting read. I was going to post some thoughts there, but they ended up long, so I'll post them here instead:

In a finite world, this gets inevitably tangled in the politics of reproduction and overpopulation. Some seek to tactically out-reproduce as a way of politically dominating, or to fear that others will, but even more basically, if we ignore such factions and stick to sheer numbers: We can be fruitful and multiply only to a point in a finite world. At some point, multiplying isn't fruitful but exhausts all fruit.

And so when people move around in a sparse world, there there may be more capacity to absorb them than in a dense one, regardless of how you define words like sparse and dense and capacity. And, of course, density is distributed unevenly. Certain standards of living or ways of living will not support more than a certain number of people. So questions arise as to whether it's the right of a people or a region to have any such standard or way of living.

Without a theory of why people would taper off reproduction as the world becomes crowded, the politics of immigration becomes tethered to the politics of reproduction. Birth itself is a kind of immigration, and sometimes people who want to taper immigration seem to nonetheless want to encourage birth, without seeing or acknowledging that each of these increases population density and strain on finite resources. In an "empty" world, the risk is of having too few people, and both birth and immigration seem obvious opportunities to mitigate risk. In a "full" world, the risk is of having too many people, and both birth and immigration seem points of concern and opportunities for risk to attach.

Of course, density is not distributed evenly in the world, so these concepts apply differently in different places, but it simplifies discussion to keep things simple. To have a coherent ethics on this, one must know where one is in the empty/full spectrum. And, of course, all gets even more complicated if one realizes that people will inevitably overlay race, religion, wealth, or nationality, but the essential problems are best seen if you hold those at bay long enough to understand it is not really possible to ignore overpopulation as a core driver of the stress. In some sense, those other factors just create ways of magnifying, partitioning, and sadly scapegoating that stress.

Discussions of both reproduction and immigration are intrinsically difficult because they get quickly into issues of how we may fairly distribute finite resources in an ever more crowded world as cultures with very different and deeply held practices and expectations come ever more inevitably into contact and, too often, conflict with one another. Achieving any sense of fairness can be a nontrivial task because each is starting from a different place and there is often no commonly agreed starting point for what can be expected to be fixed and what must be up for negotiation. It probably have to start with everyone agreeing there's a real problem and that we all need to be equitably involved in a solution, but I sense there's a lot of denial on both of these points.