shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

292
active users

#btrfs

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Edit: I'm going with LUKS + BTRFS. Thanks for the responses!

Which file system should I use for an encrypted root partition on Linux for a single disk (no RAID)?

I typically use LUKS + ext4.

I've also used encrypted BTRFS and ZFS but never worked with them to any extent beyond getting them setup. I see distros such as Fedora are now defaulting to using BTRFS.

I'm seeking some advice: Should I stick with ext4? Or use BTRFS? Or ZFS?

#AskFedi#ext4#btrfs

#btrfs-progs 6.13 is out:

lore.kernel.org/all/2025021423

github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/r

Some highlights:

mkfs:
* new option to enable compression
* updated summary (subvolumes, compression)

scrub:
* start: new option --limit to set the bandwidth limit for the duration of the run

btrfstune:
* add option to remove squota

other:
* a bit more optimized crc32c code

lore.kernel.orgBtrfs progs release 6.13 - David Sterba
Continued thread

Even more impressively, it actually cleared out some space! I started out with only 16 GB free and now I have 24 GB available for the next procrastination. #Linux #openSUSE #btrfs


sudo btrfs filesystem usage /
[sudo] password for root: 
Overall:
    Device size:                 110.53GiB
    Device allocated:            110.53GiB
    Device unallocated:            1.00MiB
    Device missing:                  0.00B
    Device slack:                    0.00B
    Used:                         84.10GiB
    Free (estimated):             24.80GiB      (min: 24.80GiB)
    Free (statfs, df):            24.80GiB
    Data ratio:                       1.00
    Metadata ratio:                   1.00
    Global reserve:              260.77MiB      (used: 0.00B)
    Multiple profiles:                  no

Anyone who's good with the #btrfs able to help me here? 😭 I'm getting "no space left on device" errors from all sorts of things but my disk isn't full. Did I run out of inodes? (is that a thing with btrfs?)

Anything obvious I should try? I'm new to this fs...

A few highlights from the main #btrfs merge for #Linux 6.14:

git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/0eb4

- more read IO balancing strategies (experimental config), add two new ways how to select a device for read if […] round-robin, balance reads across devices relevant for the requested IO range

- add encoded write ioctl support to io_uring […]

- support FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA, applications can use the metadata to do their own verification

git.kernel.orgMerge tag 'for-6.14-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux - kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git - Linux kernel source tree

I’m in a dilemma - I run #Kubuntu 24.10 on my laptop with all the Plasma 6.1 #Wayland goodness on a #btrfs + LUKS setup and I’ve been meaning to nuke and pave this to a #ZFS + native encryption + #ZFSBootMenu setup. I’m not very keen on using ZFS on a non-LTS release but can’t get Plasma 6.1 on 24.04. I could also use the vanilla #Ubuntu 24.04 with Wayland on ZFS but I’m not keen on #GNOME atm, even though work laptops (to be received soon) will have it (no ZFS or btrfs ☹️). 🤔🫤

It seems that #Thunar ( #Xubuntu default file manager ) just can't get the .Trash folder to work with #btrfs volumes using subvol #mount option. That's quite a weak achievement. Because the #swapfile must be on root volume, and therefore it's logical to use subvolume for all data, so it can be snapshotted. But if snapshots are being used, then #trash feature won't work anymore, due to the limitations linked to the #subvolumes. Yet I personally find this to be incredibly lame and totally pointless and completely unbased limitation. #Linux silliness.