Spaceflight 🚀<p>To get enough fuel ⛽ into <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/orbit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>orbit</span></a> for a <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/Mars" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mars</span></a> 🔴 mission would require at least 10 launches of the <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/SLS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SLS</span></a> rocket, or about $20 billion 💰. Just for the fuel. To use traditional propulsion, one needs to push the boundaries of <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/reuse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>reuse</span></a> ♻️ and heavy lift rockets to extreme limits—which is precisely what <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/SpaceX" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SpaceX</span></a> is trying to do with its fully reusable launch system <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/02/report-nasas-only-realistic-path-for-humans-on-mars-is-nuclear-propulsion" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">arstechnica.com/science/2021/0</span><span class="invisible">2/report-nasas-only-realistic-path-for-humans-on-mars-is-nuclear-propulsion</span></a></p><p><a href="https://spacey.space/tags/SpacecraftPropulsion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SpacecraftPropulsion</span></a> <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/reusability" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>reusability</span></a> <a href="https://spacey.space/tags/LaunchCost" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LaunchCost</span></a></p>