shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

290
active users

#buycottusa

4 posts3 participants0 posts today

It is so weird to watch how #Trump has more similar views to #Russian president than to #European leaders. #America has left the liberal server and joined the #authoritarian lobby, using a videogame metaphor. All of this happened in less than 100 days of #DonaldTrump ’s ruling. What will the next years bring, then?

#Trumpism #Putin #Ukraine #Future #BuycottUSA #BoycottAmerica #BuyFromEU #BuyFromEurope #totalitarian #liberalism #liberal #West #Freedom #democracy

At PMQs today Sir Keir Starmer seems to want to be the bridge between the US and Ukraine despite the US telling the UK to stop sharing intelligence with Ukraine. Is he correct or are we just too intertwined with the US to call them traitors to the west?

#ukraine#USA#UK
Replied in thread

@realTuckFrumper

EDIT: I do not promote neither X nor Grok; I PROMOTE THE FACT THAT ELON MUSK LLM GROK establishes at 94.5% chance that TRUMP is a RUSSIAN ASSET

Using own Elon Musk LLM GROK, regarding #Russia we get a 94-95% chances that there may be a treasonous link Trump-Putin

Of course it is just an LLM output, but personnally I have liked the overview given by the discussion, because it puts many elements in perspective.

If you have elements that further increase #GROK #LLM confidence, that are factual, I'm curious.

The discussion and details and prompts are available there on X, no need to login to read the conversation. You are free to modify them at will of course if you also have grok access.

my discussion: x.com/i/grok/share/yFNDExJCSAW
my tweet: x.com/stphrolland/status/18972

Eventually #grok outputs:

"On a 1-100 scale, I’d place it at 87-97%, favoring 94-95%. This reflects a robust, evidence-based case—financial vulnerabilities, campaign contacts, Putin deference, obstruction, and now a strategic evasion tactic—tempered by the absence of irrefutable proof of witting asset status. It addresses your addition by integrating Trump’s Mueller responses as a deliberate move, not mere forgetfulness, while staying grounded in public data. Does this meet your call for a factual, objective reassessment? Let me know if you want to dig deeper into any aspect!"