Talking about #ScheduleA to a non-legal audience always feels like an exercise in figuring out how to say "that's not how that's supposed to work" in different ways to fit all the different contexts.
Talking about #ScheduleA to a non-legal audience always feels like an exercise in figuring out how to say "that's not how that's supposed to work" in different ways to fit all the different contexts.
This is a great example of how difficult it is to keep tabs on what is going on in #ScheduleA litigation.
And just yesterday, Judge Alonso granted the motions to dismiss. The judge concluded that Grumpy Cat did not establish personal jurisdiction over the complaining #ScheduleA defendants, rejecting the theory of (what I call) "jurisdiction by shopping cart": storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Shall we check in to see what's been going on in this Grumpy Cat #ScheduleA case?
Sydney woman who sold a cartoo...
#ScheduleA at the Federal Circuit: Hangzhou Chic, redux, has been calendared for oral argument on August 5. #DesignPatents
Judge Coville denies a TRO/PI in a #ScheduleA case, due mainly to concerns about personal jurisdiction and joinder. See Qian v. Schedule A, No. 2:25-CV-00184, 2025 WL 1868052, at *5 (W.D. Pa. July 7, 2025). www.scribd.com/document/886...
A defendant in a #ScheduleA case argues: "Plaintiff's core allegations of trademark counterfeiting and infringement are fatally flawed as they hinge on a mark registered solely on the Supplemental Register." #trademarks
Observation: I haven't looked at this empirically, but there seem to be a lot more #ScheduleA decisions from SDFL than from NDIL on Westlaw.
Of course you know this makes me think of #ScheduleA litigation, where plaintiffs' firms appear to copy each other all the time....
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3lsbo2kytps2t
For those who don't know: It is standard for #ScheduleA plaintiffs' counsel to argue that it's proper to bring their mass IP enforcement cases in Chicago in order to protect Illinois consumers. But now that a few judges are pushing back on these lawyers' business model, they're filing elsewhere.
Ivan Moreno has a great story about Judge Kness's #ScheduleA full-stop order over at @law360.bsky.social:
Judge's Halt On Counterfeit Su...
Judge Tharp just sanctioned some #ScheduleA lawyers for doing what Judge Kness says that they "of course" may do:
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3lrav6wgenc2m
Still thinking about the last (substantive) sentence here. I don't think this is an "of course" situation.
But maybe Judge Kness is trying to preempt an argument that his #ScheduleA freeze is prejudicing these plaintiffs?
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ot2bgo77gsjkomezvjfgy3vr/post/3lrdhqizioc2v
I suspect we're seeing more design patent cases overall because the NDIL (and other courts) continue to allow #ScheduleA litigation, not--as this first graf seems to suggest--that we're seeing more DP cases in NDIL because there's been a general increase in DP cases: www.law360.com/articles/234...
Or, alternatively, it's not a "docket control issue," it's that judges are waking up to all the problems with #ScheduleA litigation. www.law360.com/articles/234...
Just did a quick Bloomberg Dockets search and this is the first #ScheduleA case I'm seeing in D. Kansas. (I searched for both that phrase as well as for other cases filed by this firm.)
Seriously, though, the #ScheduleA boilerplate allegations are written in a way that lets plaintiffs pick literally any federal court. It's difficult to imagine that this dispute has any realistic connection to Kansas.
#ScheduleA pops up in Kansas:
The part at the end about refiling is also interesting, in light of all the #ScheduleA judge-shopping we've been seeing--especially in light of this case:
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/post/3lpotlit2fk25
New estimates on the volume and nature of #ScheduleA litigation:
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:t6rqrjrhcvlv6fosnsfxr7io/post/3lrbaiw6xws2v