shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

276
active users

#SCOTUS

77 posts62 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@heidilifeldman 100%. I agree with you as well.

This ⬇️ :
“It may sound like Roberts was saying that Trump should litigate his disagreements with Judge Boasberg in the normal way, but what he’s really saying is that Trump should feel free to ignore lower court orders until the Supreme Court has a chance to weigh in. By refusing to say anything about Trump’s flagrant disregard for the lower court’s judicial authority, Roberts is literally telling Trump what Trump wants to hear.”

Via Elie Mystal:

"It may sound like #JohnRoberts was saying that #Trump should litigate his disagreements with Judge #Boasberg in the normal way, but what he’s really saying is that Trump should feel free to ignore lower court orders until #SCOTUS has a chance to weigh in. ...

Roberts is trying to maintain the appearance of power in the face of a president who has shown no inclination to respect it"

thenation.com/article/politics

The Nation · How a Case From 1803 Explains John Roberts’s Approach to Donald TrumpRoberts wasn’t “rebuking” Trump when he issued his statement against impeaching judges. He was bending the knee.
Continued thread

#DOJ lawyers urged an appeals court Wed to overturn a judge’s block on #Trump’s #deportation of #Venezuelans under the #AlienEnemiesAct.

The filing is the latest volley in an escalating legal battle over Trump's priority of strengthening #immigration enforcement. Trump has called for Chief US District Judge James #Boasberg's #impeachment …[&] #SCOTUS Chief Justice #JohnRoberts rebuked Trump over the impeachment threat.

#law #DueProcess #Judiciary #ConstitutionalCrisis
usatoday.com/story/news/politi

USA TODAY · Trump administration asks appeals court to reverse block on deportation of VenezuelansBy Bart Jansen

The path Elon’s on leads to having T•••• arrest #SCOTUS and claim it’s an official act. This is obvious to any immigrant but not to John Roberts. Affluenza-blindness

Continued thread

Although the article I shared above doesn't mention the agency, through that same February 18th executive order, Downmarket Mussolini also claimed absolute control of another independent regulatory body that is of great concern to all the billionaire nazis that own his regime; specifically the Federal Trade Commission or FTC.

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

Trump fires both FTC Democrats in challenge to Supreme Court precedent

"President Trump fired both Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission yesterday, advancing his administration's claim that the president can fire FTC commissioners despite a US law and a 1935 Supreme Court ruling stating that the president cannot do so without good cause.

Trump fired Democrats Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, both of whom said the firings are illegal. Trump "tried to illegally fire me. I'll see the president in court," Bedoya wrote. The FTC was created "to fight fraudsters and monopolists," but Trump "wants the FTC to be a lapdog for his golfing buddies," Bedoya said.

A statement from Slaughter said, "The President illegally fired me from my position as a Federal Trade Commissioner, violating the plain language of a statute and clear Supreme Court precedent." Slaughter said Trump "fears the accountability that opposition voices would provide if the president orders Chairman [Andrew] Ferguson to treat the most powerful corporations and their executives—like those that flanked the President at his inauguration—with kid gloves."

US law says any FTC commissioner "may be removed by the President for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." The Supreme Court held in a 1935 case, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, that "Congress intended to restrict the power of removal to one or more of those causes."

The Trump administration claims the case was wrongly decided, but the ruling is still in effect. Trump's Department of Justice said last month that it would urge the Supreme Court to reverse the Humphrey's Executor ruling, saying it "prevents the President from adequately supervising principal officers in the Executive Branch who execute the laws on the President's behalf."

I chose this article because it clearly articulates how long the Trump regime has been working on this, and what their spurious arguments to support it are; but I don't love the hint of both-sidesing here, and that isn't helped by AT changing the original title to no longer center that this is a massive power grab by the executive branch, which is embodied by president Trump. A good example of why I'm not thrilled about the writeup here is printing sub-headers like "FTC Chair: Trump can fire members." The FTC chair is of course some nazi Trump appointed in January, so I'm sure we're all surprised the maggot fascist who owes his job to Trump, thinks Trump can do whatever Trump wants to do, and that is clearly an important detail to highlight in bold, large font text. *Eyeroll*

As such, let me state that based on the current law, and existing SCOTUS precedent, Trump does not have the power to fire two Dem appointed FTC commissioners because he openly admits they'll get in the way of his dogshit plans. The caveat here of course being that we've fully descended into a game of fascist Calvinball, the GOP have a 6-3 majority in the current Supreme Court, and those berobed reactionaries have already shown a willingness to throw out precedent and make up the law as they go, so who the fuck knows if it even matters whether or not he's allowed to fire his political enemies from an independent commission. As it stands now however, what Trump is doing is unquestionably a brazen power grab and also flatly illegal.

Which then brings us to the question of why? Well, consider for a moment what the FTC has been doing recently; this is from an American Prospect article by David Dayen:

"Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, both of whom served with former chair Lina Khan in the FTC majority under Joe Biden, were told they were terminated today. The three of them made numerous advances over the past three years on antitrust and consumer protection policies, including successful challenges to numerous mergers and new rules cracking down on subscription deception, restrictive noncompete agreements, and other anti-fraud measures."

Please keep in mind that this is the agency that took Google to court and won. Alright, now consider all the extremely rich tech nazi CEOs who got Der Leader elected and really own the Trump regime; can you think of any reasons why those guys might prefer a corrupt, toothless FTC stacked full of nazis? Perhaps billions of reasons, as in dollars they can make doing shady shit that should be illegal without FTC interference?

In other words, Trump isn't just seizing power for the imperial presidency; he's paying the bills he owes billionaire CEOs by destroying the US regulatory state.

Federal Trade Commission Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya sit at a table and chat with each other at a Congressional hearing.
Ars Technica · Trump fires both FTC Democrats in challenge to Supreme Court precedentBy Jon Brodkin
#USPol#Trump#FTC

"The Trump admin continues to unload on Judge Boasberg in a new filing asking him to stay his order for more info on flights to SLV.

They say they may invoke state secrets privilege to deny him info."
-K Cheney

"In 1996, Congress created the "Alien Terrorist Removal Court" to provide expedited procedures for removing non-citizen terrorism suspects. Statute: never used, requires judicial review."
-S Vladeck

Will SCCJ Roberts rebuke Trump again?

#SCOTUS #Fascism #USPol stevevladeck.com/p/bonus-133-d

#MAGA Melts Down After Chief Justice John Roberts Rebukes Trump for Impeachment Demand

> “The Supreme Court has been such a drag on the country,”

> “They invent constitutional rights to bypass the will of the people. Losing the Court is no loss at all, it is a gain for the country. It would allow issues to be decided democratically.” thedailybeast.com/maga-melts-d #fascism #SCOTUS

Donald Trump and John Roberts.
The Daily Beast · MAGA Melts Down After Chief Justice Roberts Rebukes Trump for Impeachment DemandBy Liam Archacki