Likely Jan Lukas<p>Some things to consider that may complicate matters:</p><p>- technicians willingness to try (or also perhaps policies they may be required to follow regardless)</p><p>- relative size of patient + respirator and equipment tolerances (eg: MRI dimensions)</p><p>- other issues related to specific models of equipment (just a guess: I'm a <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/patient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>patient</span></a>, not a <a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/radiologist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>radiologist</span></a> … I have no idea whether everything is completely standardised)</p><p><a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/MedicalImaging" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MedicalImaging</span></a><br><a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/healthcare" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>healthcare</span></a><br><a href="https://mstdn.ca/tags/scanning" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>scanning</span></a></p><p>25/x</p>