Amy Clukey (she/her)<p>Any scholar of <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/MaterialHistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MaterialHistory</span></a> or <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/DressHistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DressHistory</span></a> or <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/FiberArts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FiberArts</span></a> can tell you the value of antique textiles, and how most humanities scholars can tell you about how archives conceal as much as they reveal. </p><p>Well, the same is true of recreation. Looking at an object, even using an object, cannot give you the kinds of knowledge that comes from making and remaking. </p><p>That work is hard as fuck and there is so much failure along the way. So, so much failure, and so much reward. </p><p><a href="https://zirk.us/tags/Quilts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Quilts</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/quilting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quilting</span></a></p>