shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

289
active users

#factchecking

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Crooks, liars, charlatans, snake oil salesmen, fraudsters, phonies... People who believe these lies are in a process of collective denial.

"The day after Ernst released her report, Federal News Network added an editor’s note to the post saying that Friedman’s story had been reworked to “clarify that the survey was a non-scientific survey of respondents who self-reported that they are current federal employees, and who were self-selected.”

The editors said they had also added data from an August 2024 study by the Office of Management and Budget, which found that 54% of the federal workforce was required to show up at an office every day. According to the study, just 10% of federal employees worked exclusively from home. Those allowed to have hybrid schedules ended up spending an average of 60% of their work time at federal offices.

In the world of journalism, this is how editors try to address egregious misreadings of their work. Jared Serbu, the deputy editor of Federal News Network, said he and his colleagues were taken aback by how his organization’s clearly unscientific survey had somehow been transformed into a defining statistic about federal employees.

“It was a survey of our niche audience for our niche audience,” Serbu said. “Nobody’s ever been confused about it before this.”

Later in December, a TV report cited the editor’s note and labeled the 6% number as “false.” At about the same time, PolitiFact looked at Johnson’s claim that only 1% of federal workers show up to work each day and labeled it “pants on fire,” the fact-checking site’s lowest rating for a statement that is “not accurate and makes a ridiculous claim.”

That should have ended the conversation. But it didn’t."

propublica.org/article/federal

ProPublicaThe Trump Administration Keeps Citing an Untrue Stat as It Targets Federal Workers
More from ProPublica
Continued thread

Michael McFaul, Fmr US Ambassador to #Russia & Simon Shuster, Reporter for Time Magazine join Nicolle Wallace on DeadlineWhiteHouse w/reaction to the meeting between French President Emmanuel #Macron & Donald #Trump at the White House, w/ #France’s President #FactChecking the American President for his #lies over how the war in #Ukraine is funded, & the work the French President is doing to try to keep America on the right side of history & not back a dictator in #Putin.

youtube.com/watch?v=eT9ZlcGqd5

At the same time as Meta decided to stop working with U.S. fact checkers, it revamped a program that rewards creators with high engagement. What could possibly go wrong? @ProPublica spoke to experts about how this will fuel viral hoaxes, as well as to the manager of the NO Filter Seeking Truth page, who has shared so much false information she's currently banned by Meta from earning money. She described the news about the end of fact-checking as "great information."

flip.it/E-VMhf

ProPublicaAs Facebook Abandons Fact-Checking, It’s Also Offering Bonuses for Viral Content
More from ProPublica
Replied in thread

@ShredderFeeder @goatrodeo @GottaLaff
RE
I want less opinion and more news...

I want them to spent LESS time on what might happen next week and more time what actually happened.

Which is IMO most times what the good #msnbc does, most, but more is better‼️

The expert guests, there are the future talkers and the #factchecking guests

⭕I want the #GeorgeConway types on the panel shows

"The way I look at it, #DonaldTrump is a #criminal #socialpath"

Continued thread

2/ Depuis l'essor des réseaux sociaux, les services de fact-checking sont devenus essentiels pour lutter contre la désinformation. Pourtant, ils font face à des critiques sévères, surtout de la part des populistes et des figures comme Trump et Musk. #FakeNews #FactChecking

Address science misinformation not by repeating the facts, but by building conversation and community, a social scientist argues.

From @ConversationUS: "It’s not enough for science to be right — it has to be accepted within people’s social circles to have any meaningful impact."

flip.it/by4Jic

The ConversationAddress science misinformation not by repeating the facts, but by building conversation and communityFor science to have a meaningful impact on a group of people, new information needs to spread between trusted members of that community.