Project Aldrin / Facebook into China, a partial retrospective from someone who saw some of the code
https://alecmuffett.com/article/112685
#CarelessPeople #FactChecking #ProjectAldrin #censorship #china #facebook
New York Times: "Pres. Trump said in his address to Congress that he inherited an economic catastrophe from Joe Biden. The U.S. had the strongest economy in the world when Trump took over, but it's shown signs of strain from Trump's federal funding cuts and tariffs." #politics #FactChecking #TrumpLies
We just hit 17 different causes and 80 organizations featured on our website! So, are you ready to help them fight back?
Crooks, liars, charlatans, snake oil salesmen, fraudsters, phonies... People who believe these lies are in a process of collective denial.
"The day after Ernst released her report, Federal News Network added an editor’s note to the post saying that Friedman’s story had been reworked to “clarify that the survey was a non-scientific survey of respondents who self-reported that they are current federal employees, and who were self-selected.”
The editors said they had also added data from an August 2024 study by the Office of Management and Budget, which found that 54% of the federal workforce was required to show up at an office every day. According to the study, just 10% of federal employees worked exclusively from home. Those allowed to have hybrid schedules ended up spending an average of 60% of their work time at federal offices.
In the world of journalism, this is how editors try to address egregious misreadings of their work. Jared Serbu, the deputy editor of Federal News Network, said he and his colleagues were taken aback by how his organization’s clearly unscientific survey had somehow been transformed into a defining statistic about federal employees.
“It was a survey of our niche audience for our niche audience,” Serbu said. “Nobody’s ever been confused about it before this.”
Later in December, a TV report cited the editor’s note and labeled the 6% number as “false.” At about the same time, PolitiFact looked at Johnson’s claim that only 1% of federal workers show up to work each day and labeled it “pants on fire,” the fact-checking site’s lowest rating for a statement that is “not accurate and makes a ridiculous claim.”
That should have ended the conversation. But it didn’t."
Michael McFaul, Fmr US Ambassador to #Russia & Simon Shuster, Reporter for Time Magazine join Nicolle Wallace on DeadlineWhiteHouse w/reaction to the meeting between French President Emmanuel #Macron & Donald #Trump at the White House, w/ #France’s President #FactChecking the American President for his #lies over how the war in #Ukraine is funded, & the work the French President is doing to try to keep America on the right side of history & not back a dictator in #Putin.
At the same time as Meta decided to stop working with U.S. fact checkers, it revamped a program that rewards creators with high engagement. What could possibly go wrong? @ProPublica spoke to experts about how this will fuel viral hoaxes, as well as to the manager of the NO Filter Seeking Truth page, who has shared so much false information she's currently banned by Meta from earning money. She described the news about the end of fact-checking as "great information."
@GottaLaff @timo21
RE
I don't have time during the day to watch or listen
I hear yea, and over 100 million others, are in the same situation
My main way of getting the #truthtopower and the #factchecking news is to listen to a show (no ads) from the podcasts TWICE
Really, my thing, is to listen to _some_ shows twice
So, I know how hard it is to grab quality "my news time" each day
@ShredderFeeder @goatrodeo @GottaLaff
RE
I want less opinion and more news...
I want them to spent LESS time on what might happen next week and more time what actually happened.
Which is IMO most times what the good #msnbc does, most, but more is better
The expert guests, there are the future talkers and the #factchecking guests
I want the #GeorgeConway types on the panel shows
"The way I look at it, #DonaldTrump is a #criminal #socialpath"
Ooh, https://science.feedback.org is a great resource! It's like @snopes for slightly more involved scientific questions!
Instead of quoting the words of a wannabe dictator and Musk's and Putin's puppet up and down in outrage, please quote fact checks and good critical journalism instead. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/19/factchecking-donald-trump-claims-war-ukraine
Essential reading: Paul M. Barrett's meta article on fact-checking for the Tech Policy Blog.
After providing a short history of the discipline, he goes on to debunk three myths, namely that
...fact-checking censors free speech...
...is biased against conservatives...
...and just doesn't work.
#Vance of the #Mump Regime demands more #freedom for #fascism also in #europe and an end to #factchecking -
german defense minister tell him to fuck off (in his own, slightly more polished words)
https://www.dw.com/en/msc-2025-germanys-pistorius-derides-vances-remarks/live-71599568
10/ Il est temps de repenser la manière dont nous vérifions et communiquons les faits. Si les plateformes sociales continuent de servir des intérêts idéologiques, l’avenir du journalisme et de la vérification des faits pourrait être compromis. #FuturDuJournalisme #FactChecking
2/ Depuis l'essor des réseaux sociaux, les services de fact-checking sont devenus essentiels pour lutter contre la désinformation. Pourtant, ils font face à des critiques sévères, surtout de la part des populistes et des figures comme Trump et Musk. #FakeNews #FactChecking
Address science misinformation not by repeating the facts, but by building conversation and community, a social scientist argues.
From @ConversationUS: "It’s not enough for science to be right — it has to be accepted within people’s social circles to have any meaningful impact."
Today it happened for the first time in my journalistic career: Two announcements from the USA, one crazier than the other. One a hoax, the other a fact.
The more normal and logical one was the hoax.
@AmericaMourns the problem is that #FactChecking validates the claims as something worth to question seriously.
One doesn't #FactCheck the roundness of the earth because that has been evidenced > 2.000 BCE
One doesn't "fact - check" the Shoah because there were survivors and corpses!