Chuck Darwin<p>The U.S. and China Should Consider Partnering in Space</p><p>As the U.S. presidential campaign barrels toward its big, traditional fall push, both contestants have found ways to emphasize the centrality of Washington’s <a href="https://c.im/tags/competition" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>competition</span></a> with Beijing to the country’s future.</p><p>To be sure, the United States and China have different strengths. </p><p>Partly due to its openness, the former has enormous soft power. </p><p>America has ubiquitous cultural influence. </p><p>It has far greater per capita wealth and other advantages, albeit some of them shrinking, ranging from technological innovation and economic productivity to world-leading higher education. </p><p>China, meanwhile, has eclipsed the United States as a force in international trade <br>and has leveraged its large surpluses and national savings to become the biggest global lender. </p><p>As a result of massive, sustained investments in its military and many defense-related industries, from ship building to artificial intelligence, <br>China has also become a formidable competitor in military terms.</p><p>To avoid conflict, realities like these, of tight competition between starkly different but increasingly well-matched rivals<br>—and moreover, rivals whose economies remain substantially connected<br>—will require tremendous creativity from those who manage the countries’ relationship. </p><p>The key question is how can Washington and Beijing avoid allowing ever more of their dealings with each other to devolve into a series of zero-sum contests?</p><p>One of the most powerful avenues for serious, high-level cooperation is one that has never been pursued. It exists in the skies above: <br>space. </p><p>Currently, both countries are investing heavily in space exploration in ways that do nothing to further their sense of trust or common purpose. </p><p>By law, in fact, the United States has ruled out cooperation in space with China since 2011. </p><p>As two big issues amply illustrate, though<br>—one of them a looming crisis and the other a shared human challenge<br>—there has never been a better time to reconsider this ill-conceived restriction.</p><p>For some, mention of an impending crisis might bring to mind the dangerous ongoing problems of NASA’s present Starliner mission, <br>whose Boeing vessel has suffered serious failures, creating an elevated sense of danger and uncertainty about the return to Earth of that mission’s astronauts. </p><p>But beyond the 2011 law, national pride prevents Washington from enlisting help of any kind from Beijing with this challenge. M</p><p>It would be unrealistic to expect anything to change in time for China to play any role in getting the Starliner crew back to Earth safely. </p><p>However, a situation like this underscores what China and the United States could gain by forming a mutual aid agreement to extend their good offices in the case of manned civilian missions in distress in the future.</p><p>There is another looming crisis, however, <br>one with much smaller immediate stakes than the Starliner mission, <br>and therefore one for which Beijing and Washington should be able to fashion an agenda of deep cooperation more easily. </p><p>The problem is the <a href="https://c.im/tags/proliferation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>proliferation</span></a> of <a href="https://c.im/tags/space" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>space</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/debris" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>debris</span></a>, which poses serious risks to manned missions in orbit and to the satellites that both countries, and indeed the whole world, <br>are increasingly reliant on. </p><p>Over the years, both countries have contributed heavily to this problem, </p><p>with a recent incident involving a failed Chinese rocket serving as a timely reminder of the accumulating danger.</p><p>Even without tackling something as politically challenging as shared missions, pairing crew members, or space station visits, <br>the two countries should be able to work out a cooperation on this issue<br>—one that could help build confidence between them, <br>as well as reassure the rest of the world that their competition has reasonable limits.</p><p>The second potential area for cooperation<br>—the shared human challenge<br>—involves something of a much higher order than clearing space junk.</p><p>To the casual observer, the United States and China appear to be competing over bragging rights involving exploration of the moon. </p><p>As everyone knows, the United States first landed astronauts there in 1969, making this pursuit something of an anticlimax for some, <br>including people in Congress who authorize spending. </p><p>But in fact, beyond lingering scientific aims, <br>missions to the moon these days are largely about eventual human travel to Mars. </p><p>The moon is useful as a slingshot, and especially as a source of minerals and water, <br>the latter of which can be broken into hydrogen and oxygen and used as fuel.</p><p><a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/08/27/the-u-s-and-china-should-consider-partnering-in-space/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">foreignpolicy.com/2024/08/27/t</span><span class="invisible">he-u-s-and-china-should-consider-partnering-in-space/</span></a></p>