petersuber<p>"As <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ProQuest" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ProQuest</span></a> exits the print book market, will we see a new era of <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/bigdeals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>bigdeals</span></a> for <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ebooks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ebooks</span></a>?"<br><a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2025/02/21/as-proquest-exits-the-print-book-market-will-we-see-a-new-era-of-big-deals-for-ebooks/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial</span><span class="invisible">sciences/2025/02/21/as-proquest-exits-the-print-book-market-will-we-see-a-new-era-of-big-deals-for-ebooks/</span></a></p><p>"Commercial publishers prefer institutions to sign up to a leasing <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/subscription" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>subscription</span></a> model, as they offer little in the way of perpetual rights. This means that if a <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Library" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Library</span></a> decides to cancel, they have no owned content to show for their expenditure."</p><p>PS: I hope <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/libraries" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>libraries</span></a> steer clear of this atrocious model. It uses their real need for access against them. If they're desperate enough to buy a subscription, they're letting their desperation lead them into a trap.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/books" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>books</span></a></p>