Droppie [infosec] 🐨:archlinux: :kde: :firefox_nightly: :thunderbird: :vegan:<p>repatriate members of our diaspora communities should never underestimate our capabilities and resolve," Burgess said.</p><p>Of course, he means business and is oblivious of the many contradictions between what he, on behalf of ASIO, says and what it does in the national security space.</p><p>Burgess never misses an opportunity to suggest that China is a great threat and is engaged in large-scale spying on us. It is, apparently, the worst it has ever been.</p><p>Like many members of those who seem to think that war is inevitable, he has never had a reproach for the role of some of our allies in stoking up conflict, and community disharmony.</p><p>He is not a Cassandra warning us that we are living in a dream so much as an advocate of pre-emptive conflict.</p><p>There is an extensive lobby singing from the same hymn sheet, with others, former professional colleagues of Burgess, discussing mass internment in the event of war. Polling evidence from the Lowy Institute suggests that more Australians regard the US as a greater threat to our sovereignty than China.</p><p>As it happens, one reason I feel uneasy about the arrests is that I had an office in the building where the crime is alleged to have occurred.</p><p>I occasionally let in would-be Chinese worshippers and listened to their children tearing around the stairwells and corridors of the four-storey building.</p><p>I thought the coincidence of the offices on the ground floor amusing. On one side was a business apparently promoting travel to China, and assistance with student visas and entry into educational institutions.</p><p>On the other side was Five Eyes Consulting, which seemed to be about selling specialist advice from expert former intelligence folk about cyber security and such things.</p><p>Each could look on the other. Or on Chinese visitors or (presumably) harassers and intimidators. It was very cosy; I was focused on sorting my books, but it could have been cover, of course.</p><p>Mike Burgess's making ex-cathedra statements invites questions about his judgment, his leadership and stock of ideas.</p><p>Some of his ideas - for example in his correspondence with Mike Pezzullo about creating a national security surveillance state of Australia that would put China to shame or his own-goal advice about the exclusion of Huawei from 5G research - fail to show a proper balance between the needs of security and respect for democratic rights. Getting national security any infusion of cred requires putting it in better hands.</p><ul><li>Jack Waterford is a former editor of The Canberra Times</li></ul><p><strong>QUOTE ENDS</strong></p><p><a href="https://infosec.space/tags/AusPol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>AusPol</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/WhyIsLabor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>WhyIsLabor</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/HahahahaLiebs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HahahahaLiebs</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/NatsAreNuts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NatsAreNuts</span></a> 2/2</p>