Chuck Darwin<p>It’s fairly common for investigative journalists to be accused of being paid shills, or agents of a foreign power. <br>Foreign dictators and kleptocrats do it daily. </p><p>But becoming the target of a “deep state” conspiracy theory <br>endorsed by the world’s richest man and supporters of the president of the United States is something else entirely.</p><p>That’s what happened to me last week. </p><p>It began because of a story, which a colleague and I wrote in collaboration with BuzzFeed News in July 2019. </p><p>It shed light on Rudy Giuliani's attempts to dig up negative information on Donald Trump’s political opponents in Ukraine, <br>where I was based at the time.</p><p>The story made a small splash when it was published, <br>mostly among politicos and Ukraine-watchers, but didn’t get a lot of traction. </p><p>That was fine with me. </p><p>As an Australian journalist working in Eastern Europe, I was just glad that I had published an interesting story that pushed forward what was known about Giuliani’s dealings in Ukraine. </p><p>But that September, it was cited in the footnotes of a report by a CIA whistleblower that sparked Trump’s first impeachment. </p><p>This citation is now at the center of absurd claims that we, <br>as professional reporters, <br>were part of a “deep state” plot to bring down the president of the United States.</p><p>The pretext for this is that, <br>like scores of independent media outlets around the world, <br>OCCRP had received grants from USAID, <br>the United States’ foreign development agency, <br>which has recently come under the crosshairs of the new Trump administration. </p><p>(As with all of our donors, USAID is contractually obligated to stay out of editorial work.) </p><p>One particularly excitable writer, <a href="https://c.im/tags/Michael" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Michael</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Shellenberger" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Shellenberger</span></a>, <br>who identifies himself as a free speech advocate, has gone so far as to label our story <br>“highly illegal and even treasonous.” </p><p>The irony of it all? </p><p>The story started as an investigation into the same target that Giuliani was after: <br>Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian gas company he worked for, Burisma. </p><p>But the thing about objective reporting is that it can lead you to unexpected places.</p><p>Here’s how it began. </p><p>It was the middle of 2019, <br>and I was relatively new to Ukraine, <br>having moved there to live with my now-wife and work as an OCCRP editor helping local journalists with their investigations. </p><p>I asked my Ukrainian colleagues what they thought we should be reporting on. -- They suggested we look into Hunter Biden and Burisma.</p><p>There had already been a fair bit of reporting on the younger Biden's questionable relationship with the company. </p><p>As an investigative reporter, I wondered if we could find something new to say about the situation. </p><p>I came across a series of articles written for The Hill by <a href="https://c.im/tags/John" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>John</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Solomon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Solomon</span></a>, a conservative journalist, in which he made the explosive allegation that Joe Biden had pressured Ukraine to fire its former chief prosecutor, <a href="https://c.im/tags/Viktor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Viktor</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Shokin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Shokin</span></a>, <br>in order to bury a case against Burisma. </p><p>To check this, I called up some anti-corruption experts in Ukraine who had been part of the effort to go after Burisma. </p><p>They were friendly enough, but it was clear they thought I was a bit wet behind the ears.</p><p>They explained that I had the story backwards. </p><p>👉Ukrainians, they said, had been out on the streets protesting against Shokin because he was the one protecting Burisma from investigation, not the other way around. </p><p>In fact, Biden had called for Shokin’s firing even though Burisma was paying his son. </p><p>This didn’t absolve Hunter of wrongdoing — but it showed that, while making a handsome salary, he had failed to deliver the level of insider access Burisma may have hoped for.</p><p>My original story idea was dead, though I did ultimately work on another investigation that cast scrutiny on Hunter Biden’s business partner the following year. </p><p>(Strangely, our detractors seem to overlook that one.) </p><p>Meanwhile, I had a new mystery to unravel: </p><p>how it came to be that a distorted version of the Hunter Biden/Burisma story had gained traction in the United States. </p><p>I don’t usually cover the U.S., <br>and I felt a little out of my depth. </p><p>So my Ukrainian colleagues and I reached out to BuzzFeed News to collaborate.</p><p>We scoured the internet and started making calls on both sides of the Atlantic. </p><p>The upside-down story being told by Solomon (and Giuliani) had clearly come from the former prosecutor Shokin, and his successor, Yuriy Lutsenko.</p><p>We thought the answer might lie with two mysterious Ukraine-linked figures who had grown close to Giuliani, <br>Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. </p><p>Both born in the Soviet Union, the men pursued a colorful life in South Florida. </p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/Fruman" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Fruman</span></a> was a businessman with ties back in the Ukrainian city of Odesa to a well-known gangster, known as “The Lightbulb.” </p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/Parnas" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Parnas</span></a> was a former stockbroker with a history of unpaid debts.</p><p>(1/2)<br><a href="https://www.occrp.org/en/feature/investigative-reporting-is-free-speech-not-treason" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">occrp.org/en/feature/investiga</span><span class="invisible">tive-reporting-is-free-speech-not-treason</span></a></p>