EFSJ - European Federation for Science Journalism<p><em>This is a guest article by Mićo Tatalović, an EFSJ board member</em></p><p>Science journalism is still not as diverse and inclusive as it could be.</p><p>As a result, many publications overlook topics and themes that would be better represented if they had a more diverse team.</p><p>For example, research news from eastern Europe is grossly underreported in Western media – but does become a topic of interest when there is someone on staff who cares about and understands the region.</p><p>A case study based on my experience as Europe news editor at Nature shows that a single staffer with an eye on an underrepresented topic, or region in this case, can make a huge difference in coverage.</p><p>For example, looking at a two-month period during which I was actively commissioning and publishing stories, January to early March 2019, and comparing that to the same period before and after reveals a striking difference.</p><p>Nature’s news section ran 9 stories about Eastern Europe in that period, compared with just 2 such stories in the same period in 2018 and 2020 when I wasn’t working there.</p><p>The dearth of coverage of the region continues if one looks at other years, too, with just 3 such stories in the same 2-month period in 2017 (one of them was mine, pitched and written as a freelancer), and none in the main news section in 2024.</p><p>In fact, in the five years since I left Nature news, there have been no dedicated news stories about issues in a whole range of countries we reported on when I was there, including Albania, Kosovo, Moldova, North Macedonia, and Serbia. It’s as if they did not exist. This is despite Nature’s aim to be an international journal aimed at readers “throughout the world” and its <a href="https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/about/diversity-commitment" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">commitment to diversity</a>, including geography.</p><p>The data on the number of stories is also reflected in my experience of commissioning stories there. It felt like an extra effort was needed to convince editors to cover the region. It’s as if a lack of interest combined with a distrust of information from the region conspire against coverage.</p><p>Two examples stand out. When we published a story about an extraordinary situation in Serbia, where researchers were left in limbo with no grant funding competitions and no pay rises for a decade, the news editor told me in a somewhat bemused manner that it was their first ever Serbia story. They had been working at Nature for about 5 years.</p><p>There have also been no dedicated news stories about Serbia’s issues since then, which suggests that a major regional power that was involved in the first wars on European soil since World War 2, and is a key geopolitical player between the West and Russia (and China to an extent) would have had precisely zero coverage on Nature’s news pages for well over a decade if it wasn’t for one story that I commissioned.</p><p>The second example that stands out is Ukraine. I spent months working up coverage to mark the five-year anniversary of Russia’s initial invasion in 2014. Nature didn’t cover Ukraine much in that five-year period after the initial stories in the immediate aftermath of the invasion, so there was a lot to say and catch up on.</p><p>The five-year anniversary of the invasion wasn’t seen as a strong news peg, but I was tentatively allowed to look into it and see if there was anything worth reporting.</p><p>Different potential angles emerged, such as Ukraine’s continued poor performance in winning EU research grants, despite Europe’s promises of better engagement. There were also colourful details, such as the country’s science academy being led by a centenarian.</p><p>But when I pitched not one but two stories based on that research, they were met with resistance from editors. They just did not think Ukraine and any issues there would warrant more than one story.</p><p>There was reluctance to cover eastern Europe, and central Asia – another overlooked region, at other publications I’ve worked at, too, including SciDev.Net and Research Professional News. And at New Scientist, it sometimes felt as if a story had to work extra-hard to make the cut if it was from that region, the location itself seemingly detracting from the story’s intrinsic interest in the minds of editors.</p><p>There are similar editorial attitudes in many western publications towards other parts of the world, and other issues, too.</p><p>But I’ve also seen quick transformations when a reporter or editor who cares is empowered to report on them.</p><p>The key thing is having a diverse workforce in science journalism, and keeping an open mind towards issues the publication may not have reported on as much. And perhaps questioning one’s assumptions and attitudes and why they exist, as well as any conscious or unconscious biases.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><a href="https://efsj.eu/2025/01/30/importance-of-diversity-for-more-inclusive-science-reporting-a-case-study/" class="" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://efsj.eu/2025/01/30/importance-of-diversity-for-more-inclusive-science-reporting-a-case-study/</a></p><p><a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/dei/" target="_blank">#DEI</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/diversity/" target="_blank">#diversity</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/east-europe/" target="_blank">#EastEurope</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/edi/" target="_blank">#EDI</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/geography/" target="_blank">#geography</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/nature/" target="_blank">#Nature</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/science-journalism/" target="_blank">#scienceJournalism</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/serbia/" target="_blank">#Serbia</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://efsj.eu/tag/ukraine/" target="_blank">#Ukraine</a></p>