drukac<p><a href="https://historians.social/tags/disinformation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>disinformation</span></a> <a href="https://historians.social/tags/denialism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>denialism</span></a> <a href="https://historians.social/tags/AntiScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AntiScience</span></a> <a href="https://historians.social/tags/ScienceDenialism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ScienceDenialism</span></a> <a href="https://historians.social/tags/quacks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quacks</span></a> </p><p>The decline of Sabine Hossenfender as a science communicator is sad and worrying. As Professor Dave says, I don’t begrudge her attempt to make money in these hard times. But the way she happily will jettison science and replace it with paranoid accusations tells me she either has no principles she won’t sell for a buck, or she had fundamentally messed up principles to begin with.</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/70vYj1KPyT4" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">youtu.be/70vYj1KPyT4</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>