Kevin Karhan :verified:<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@lymenzies" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>lymenzies</span></a></span> From my own experience I can tell that even the Original <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RaspberryPi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RaspberryPi</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/@lymenzies/114821321531498129" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">and</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PiZero" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PiZero</span></a> can run <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RaspberryPiOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RaspberryPiOS</span></a> all day long and will run circles around the orginal <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/EeePC701" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>EeePC701</span></a>, only getting beaten by the <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Vaio" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Vaio</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/P11Z" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>P11Z</span></a> when it comes to <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/RAM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RAM</span></a> and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/IO" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IO</span></a> options. </p><ul><li><p>Granted a <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/CM4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CM4</span></a> or <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/CM5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>CM5</span></a> with > 2GB RAM will shift the tides but those alone cost more than a used <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Wyse3040" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Wyse3040</span></a> and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/upcycling" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>upcycling</span></a> a <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ThinClient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ThinClient</span></a> into something like a <a href="https://fosstodon.org/@lymenzies/114577908824005814" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">tiny luggable</a> is propably more budget friendly and useful anyway, espechally since built-in Gigabit <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/Ethernet" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Ethernet</span></a> and <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/USB" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>USB</span></a> 3.0 really kick ass, so you'd propably be better served doing some <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/PoE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PoE</span></a> / Wide-Range DC-in & battery setup to make good use of the oversized build volume at hand.</p></li><li><p>Maybe take some <em>"THICC"</em> 21700 LiFePO4 cells or one of those <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/LiFePO4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LiFePO4</span></a> motorcycle batteries for a spin? Pretty shure that you can sqeeze battery runtime measured in DAYS out of it without much tweaking.</p></li></ul>