Stephen Hoffman<p>More for entertainment, got <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/OpenVMS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenVMS</span></a> servers bound to <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/macOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>macOS</span></a> Server for external authentication.</p><p>Had to de-tune some of the network security too, due to limitations on OpenVMS.</p><p>Alas, Apple dropped macOS Server.</p><p>(Still salty about that deprecation, too.)</p><p>Which means further similar shenanigans now necessarily involve a <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Synology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Synology</span></a> NAS box or other source of <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/LDAP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LDAP</span></a> or directory services.</p><p>Synology NAS and <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/FreeBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeBSD</span></a> have together been subsuming what macOS Server had been providing, too.</p><p>How the back-end servers shift, too. Decades ago, OpenVMS had been that server for many apps. Even the front-end prior to Y2K, too. Now, not so much.</p><p><a href="https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/packages?os_ver=7.2" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">synology.com/en-us/dsm/package</span><span class="invisible">s?os_ver=7.2</span></a></p>