Felix Palmen 📯<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.lol/@hl" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>hl</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@xdydx" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>xdydx</span></a></span> <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/FreeBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>FreeBSD</span></a> has only support for SMBv1, which you should absolutely avoid for security reasons, although you can probably configure <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/samba" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>samba</span></a> to still allow it ... but ... don't. Nowadays I'd prefer to say FreeBSD does not support mounting SMB shares.</p><p>There are some ports available implementing "modern" SMB (v2/v3) on top of <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/fuse" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>fuse</span></a>, which might be an option, but in my experience, they're not perfectly reliable and performance isn't the greatest either.</p><p>If ever possible, work on the server side and see whether you can share via <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/NFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NFS</span></a> instead. Either <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/NFSv3" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NFSv3</span></a> (which is only "secure" as long as your network is perfectly secure and you control all participating machines, but at least it doesn't pretend to do anything else), or <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/NFSv4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NFSv4</span></a> with <a href="https://techhub.social/tags/kerberos" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>kerberos</span></a> security.</p>