Dan Goodman<p>Defending science in public we often talk about 'peer reviewed science'. But could this framing contribute to undermining trust in science and holding us back from improving the scientific process? How about instead we talk about the work that has received the most thorough and transparent scrutiny?</p><p>Peer review goes a step towards this in having a couple of people scrutinise the work, but there are limits on how thorough it can be and in most journals it's not transparent. Switching the framing to transparent scrutiny allows us to experiment with other models with a path to improvement.</p><p>For example, making review open to all, ongoing, and all reviews published improves this. When authors make their raw data and code open, it improves this.</p><p>It also gives us a way to criticise problematic organisations that formally do peer review but add little value (e.g. predatory journals). If their reviews are not open and observably of poor quality, then they are less 'thoroughly transparent'. </p><p>So with this framing the existence of 'peer reviewed' but clearly poor quality work doesn't undermine trust in science as a whole because we don't pin our meaning and value on an exploitable binary measure of 'peer reviewed'.</p><p>It also offers a hopeful way forward because it shows us how we can improve, and every step towards this becomes meaningful. If all we have is binary 'peer reviewed' or not, why spend more effort doing it better?</p><p>In summary, I think this new framing would be better for science, both in terms of the public perception of it, and for us as scientists.</p><p><a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> <a href="https://neuromatch.social/tags/peerreview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>peerreview</span></a></p>
shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.
Administered by:
Server stats:
268active users
shakedown.social: About · Status · Profiles directory · Privacy policy
Mastodon: About · Get the app · Keyboard shortcuts · View source code · v4.4.2
#metascience
0 posts · 0 participants · 0 posts today
RaymondPierreL3<p>“…the sight of a high-ranking university representative stepping in to save a big tech executive from answering a difficult question was deeply embarrassing (or at least should have been) for all concerned.”<br> <br>And this is the point. <a href="https://aus.social/tags/BigTech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BigTech</span></a> shielded by academics (a patchy cover at best, though a telling of the power of wealth and its financial control of scientific research). I this case it was about <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Google" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Google</span></a>’s AI products where its representative executive Anna Koivuniemi of Google <a href="https://aus.social/tags/DeepMind" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DeepMind</span></a> was shielding that the high-ranking university representative and chair, Geraint Rees, ruled an ‘embarrassing’ question out of order.</p><p>It’s a short, but enlightening, read well worth your time if your interests include the use of <a href="https://aus.social/tags/GenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GenAI</span></a> in scientific <a href="https://aus.social/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://aus.social/tags/ResearchIntegrity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchIntegrity</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/GenAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>GenAI</span></a>&ScientificResearch <a href="https://aus.social/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> </p><p>Read more: <a href="https://warrenpearce.pika.page/posts/what-is-metascience-issues-inclusion-and-future-public-value" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">warrenpearce.pika.page/posts/w</span><span class="invisible">hat-is-metascience-issues-inclusion-and-future-public-value</span></a></p>
Tom Stafford<p>JOB : Join RoRI as a Research Fellow/Senior Research Fellow in Metascience</p><p><a href="https://researchonresearch.org/join-rori-as-a-research-fellow-senior-research-fellow-in-metascience/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">researchonresearch.org/join-ro</span><span class="invisible">ri-as-a-research-fellow-senior-research-fellow-in-metascience/</span></a></p><p>Closing 9th of July, based in London/hybrid. Full time, fixed term until 31/12/2027</p><p>(apologies for late notice, full disclosure: I am a <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://indieweb.social/@RoRInstitute" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>RoRInstitute</span></a></span> research fellow)</p><p>--> please boost for reach <--</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metascience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Metascience2025" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metascience2025</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Metaresearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metaresearch</span></a></p>
tlohde<p>The fruits of following my curiosity yesterday - a little Sunday Study on citations.</p><p><a href="https://tlohde.com/blog/2025/06/becoming-irrelevant/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">tlohde.com/blog/2025/06/becomi</span><span class="invisible">ng-irrelevant/</span></a></p><p>Motivated by <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@sundogplanets" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>sundogplanets</span></a></span> 's post on citing old papers: <a href="https://mastodon.social/@sundogplanets/114677909402696290" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mastodon.social/@sundogplanets</span><span class="invisible">/114677909402696290</span></a></p><p>I haven't checked, because I wanted to do it anyway, but I'm sure someone out there has done this more thoroughly and properly.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ResearchAboutResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchAboutResearch</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/citations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>citations</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAlex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAlex</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Nature" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Nature</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a></p>
Zack Batist<p>Open scholarly metadata is actually such a huge mess, especially for monographs, edited volumes, grey lit, i.e. anything that isn't an english STEM journal article.</p><p>Which actually explains so much about why the "metascience" scene is how it is....</p><p><a href="https://archaeo.social/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> <a href="https://archaeo.social/tags/metaresearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metaresearch</span></a> <a href="https://archaeo.social/tags/bibliometrics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bibliometrics</span></a></p>
Bennett<p>I and may amazing advisor <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@nicole_c_nelson" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>nicole_c_nelson</span></a></span> and our brilliant collaborator Kelsey preprinted! 🖨️ </p><p>"Adverserial" reanalyses of regulatory data pose a deep problem for existing methods of adjudicating which science our regulations should be based on</p><p>This is, unfortunately, a continually-relevant story about what <a href="https://assemblag.es/tags/openscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>openscience</span></a> and <a href="https://assemblag.es/tags/opendata" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>opendata</span></a> mean for how we make regulations and come to consensus as a society</p><p><a href="https://assemblag.es/tags/sts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sts</span></a> <a href="https://assemblag.es/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/jfbr8_v1" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/jfb</span><span class="invisible">r8_v1</span></a></p>
Ulrike Hahn<p>I just saw that <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metascience</span></a> 2025 has John Ioannides as a featured speaker and I have to say I‘m surprised by that choice</p><p><a href="https://metascience.info" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">metascience.info</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
Jordi Cabot<p>A <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metascience</span></a> Study of the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LowCode" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LowCode</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Scientific" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Scientific</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Field" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Field</span></a> 📊📊</p><p>We aimed to:<br>☑️ Analyze the composition and growth (e.g., size, diversity, venues, and topics) of the emerging <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LowCode" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LowCode</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/community" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>community</span></a>; and <br>☑️ Explore how these aspects differ from those of the “classical” <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/modeldriven" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>modeldriven</span></a> community.</p><p>This covers <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ResearchQuestions" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchQuestions</span></a> such as:</p><p>❓Are Low-Code <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/publications" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>publications</span></a> affecting the number of traditional <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Modeling" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Modeling</span></a> publications?<br>❓How many Modeling conferences and workshops aim to explicitly attract Low-Code publications?<br>❓How are authors distributed across Low-Code and traditional Modeling publications?<br>❓ How many Low-Code open-source platforms and tools explicitly relate to traditional Modeling techniques?<br> <br>Lots of interesting insights 🤯🤯🤯 </p><p>Read the post for the full details ⬇️⬇️⬇️ and/or meet me at the next <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/STAF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>STAF</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ECMFA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ECMFA</span></a> conference in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Koblenz" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Koblenz</span></a> next month</p><p><a href="https://modeling-languages.com/metascience-adoption-low-code/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">modeling-languages.com/metasci</span><span class="invisible">ence-adoption-low-code/</span></a></p>
Tom Stafford<p>Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides</p><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02153-1" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/s41562-025</span><span class="invisible">-02153-1</span></a></p><p>New in NHB </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metascience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/Metaresearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Metaresearch</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Researchers planning to do <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SystematicReviews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SystematicReviews</span></a> must now plan to filter out the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/JunkScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>JunkScience</span></a>. That's difficult, time-consuming, error-prone, and demoralizing. It causes some researchers to drop their plans and forces others to move more slowly.<br><a href="https://www.science.org/content/article/systematic-reviews-aim-extract-broad-conclusions-many-studies-are-peril" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">science.org/content/article/sy</span><span class="invisible">stematic-reviews-aim-extract-broad-conclusions-many-studies-are-peril</span></a><br>(<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/paywalled" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>paywalled</span></a>) </p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Academia</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LiteratureReviews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LiteratureReviews</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaResearch</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScholComm" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScholComm</span></a> <br><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/academicchatter" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>academicchatter</span></a></span></p>
T. T. Perry<p>"Psychology has been operating for too long on the basis of implicit paradigms that are taken for granted and no longer considered explicitly, thereby relying on too many (meanwhile) hidden assumptions that urgently need reappraisal, critical reflection and even radical change and renewal"</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Psychology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PhilosophyOfScience</span></a></p>
T. T. Perry<p>Operationalization Bias: A Suboptimal Research Practice in Psychology <br>Nagireddy Reddy, PsyArXiv Preprint (2022)</p><p>"This article discusses a suboptimal research practice, the operationalization bias, i.e., the practice of operationalizing a construct or phenomenon selectively, through the exclusive employment of one or very few variables and, in turn, neglecting to employ alternative operationalizations."</p><p><a href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/prqyt" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/prqy</span><span class="invisible">t</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Psychology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PsyArXiv" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PsyArXiv</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a></p>
T. T. Perry<p>Making sense of charges of scientism in psychology and beyond: Logical and epistemological implications. <br>Held, B. S. 2022, Theory & Psychology.</p><p>"If mainstream psychology is a bad science to the point of reflecting the relentless incorrigibility of its practitioners, why would theoretical psychologists who assert mainstream psychology’s scientism even consider working within any of its frameworks?"</p><p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbara-Held-2/publication/359882013_Making_sense_of_charges_of_scientism_in_psychology_and_beyond_Logical_and_epistemological_implications/links/628f95eb8d19206823dca91f/Making-sense-of-charges-of-scientism-in-psychology-and-beyond-Logical-and-epistemological-implications.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">researchgate.net/profile/Barba</span><span class="invisible">ra-Held-2/publication/359882013_Making_sense_of_charges_of_scientism_in_psychology_and_beyond_Logical_and_epistemological_implications/links/628f95eb8d19206823dca91f/Making-sense-of-charges-of-scientism-in-psychology-and-beyond-Logical-and-epistemological-implications.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/metaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metaScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>psychology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a></p>
Clarissa<p>Did a top NIH official manipulate Alzheimer's and Parkinson’s studies for decades?</p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/biology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>biology</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/neuroscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>neuroscience</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>medicine</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> <br><a href="https://www.science.org/content/article/research-misconduct-finding-neuroscientist-eliezer-masliah-papers-under-suspicion" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">science.org/content/article/re</span><span class="invisible">search-misconduct-finding-neuroscientist-eliezer-masliah-papers-under-suspicion</span></a></p>
Clarissa<p>This Study Was Hailed as a Win for Science Reform. Now It’s Being Retracted.</p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>psychology</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> <br><a href="https://www.chronicle.com/article/this-study-was-hailed-as-a-win-for-science-reform-now-its-being-retracted" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">chronicle.com/article/this-stu</span><span class="invisible">dy-was-hailed-as-a-win-for-science-reform-now-its-being-retracted</span></a></p>
Carl T. Bergstrom<p>Thinking about the dynamics of the research pipeline in academic computer science and data science, I'm struck by the prescience of Partha Dasgupta and Paul David's 1987 piece on information disclosure in science and technology. <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a></p>
Ross Gayler<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@ct_bergstrom" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>ct_bergstrom</span></a></span> </p><p>Nice work. </p><p>Don Braben (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Braben" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_B</span><span class="invisible">raben</span></a>) was making a related argument (minus the modelling) in the 1980s (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/316401a0" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">doi.org/10.1038/316401a0</span><span class="invisible"></span></a>).</p><p>He argued that revolutionary research (e.g. Planck, Einstein) would not get funded under 1980s state funding arrangements (and it's arguably worse now). He identified funding by committee and peer review as the culprits (so, systemic incentive mechanisms - as you investigated).</p><p>For a while he ran a research funding scheme that attempted to fund revolutionary research. It was bankrolled by BP as an act of philanthropy before the "shareholder value" crowd caught on to what was happening.</p><p>There is a snapshot of Braben's old website on the Internet Archive: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060421040238/http://www.frontier.co.uk/VentureResearch/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">web.archive.org/web/2006042104</span><span class="invisible">0238/http://www.frontier.co.uk/VentureResearch/</span></a></p><p>His BRAVERI index is amusing in a gallows-humour way: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01065-8" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)</span><span class="invisible">01065-8</span></a></p><p><a href="https://aus.social/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/ResearchFunding" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ResearchFunding</span></a></p>
Clarissa<p>Medicine is plagued by untrustworthy clinical trials. How many studies are faked or flawed?</p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>medicine</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/metascience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>metascience</span></a> <br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02299-w?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nature&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1689682624" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-023</span><span class="invisible">-02299-w?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nature&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1689682624</span></a></p>
T. T. Perry<p>Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science<br>Rink Hoekstra & Simine Vazire, 2021</p><p>"We provide a set of recommendations on how to increase intellectual humility in research articles and highlight the central role peer reviewers can play in incentivizing authors to foreground the flaws and uncertainty in their work, thus enabling full and transparent evaluation of the validity of research."</p><p>PDF: <a href="https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/226307507/Hoekstra_et_al_2021_NHB.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/por</span><span class="invisible">tal/226307507/Hoekstra_et_al_2021_NHB.pdf</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Humility" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Humility</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a></p>
T. T. Perry<p>Making the circumcision controversy controversial: Going meta and taking aim at the messenger(s): Reply to Wamai et al.,<br>de Camargo Jr et al., 2015, Global Public Health</p><p>"For those of us who study the use of rhetoric in science, their commentary offers a fascinating example of many of the well-documented observations made by authors working in Science and Technology Studies."</p><p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441692.2014.989533" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10</span><span class="invisible">80/17441692.2014.989533</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Colonialism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Colonialism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Positivism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Positivism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MetaScience</span></a></p>
TrendingLive feeds
Mastodon is the best way to keep up with what's happening.
Follow anyone across the fediverse and see it all in chronological order. No algorithms, ads, or clickbait in sight.
Create accountLoginDrag & drop to upload