shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

278
active users

#isp

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@Jarek @landley that assumes #IPv6 addresses are static (Providers in #Germany do "pseudostatic" alike #IPv4 and unless one's a business customer, will forcibly disconnect once each 24 hours and reassign a new IP) and that applications ain't configured to prefer IPv4 over IPv6 just to avoid timeouts and having to check if IPv6 exists since the only "#IPv6only" #ISP I know is #Starlink (and even they do #CGNAT due to customer complaints…)

Replied in thread

@landley @jschauma @ryanc @0xabad1dea yeah, the exhaustion problem would've been shoved back with a #64bit or sufficiently delayed by a 40bit number.

Unless we also hate #NAT and expect every device to have a unique static #IP (which is a #privacy nightmare at best that "#PrivacyExtensions" barely fixed.)

  • I mean they could've also gone the #DECnet approach and use the #EUI48 / #MAC-Address (or #EUI64) as static addressing system, but that would've made #vendors and not #ISPs the powerful forces of allocation. (Similar to how technically the #ICCID dictates #GSM / #4G / #5G access and not the #IMEI unless places like Australia ban imported devices.

I guess using a #128bit address space was inspired by #ZFS doing the same before, as the folks who designed both wanted to design a solution that clearly will outlive them (way harder than COBOL has outlived Grace Hopper)...

If I was @BNetzA I would've mandated #DualStack and banned #CGNAT (or at least the use of CGNAT in #RFC1918 address spaces) as well as #DualStackLite!

Replied in thread

@shoppingtonz @alternativeto @torproject also every #Tunneling - regardless if #SSH or #VPN or whatever - will inevitably introduce #latency (unless you happen to be customer of a shitty #ISP with horrible #peering and thus can cut down on hops needed, which is AFAIK only a theoretical scenario)...

In fact I stopped using #HEnet #Tunnelbroker and #IPv6-#GIF-Tunneling because it created more issued than it solved on my #IPv4only #Internet connection…

Question to the network people out there:

Are there any ISPs that are IPv6 only (without providing a NAT/whatever)?

Background: Having an argument with a provider that hasn't published any AAAA records, and whilst I think that's poor form, I'm wondering if this would actually negatively affect any actual users in practice?

#ip#ipv6#ipv4

I suspect #NBN contractors might be at work in my street [& specifically outside my house atm], finally running fibre-optic cable up my street from the node box ~700 m away. A normal peep would not speculate, but simply wander outside, say g'day, & have a look/ask. Ofc not me though; i'm quietly under my bed, trembling with all the other silverfish & cockroaches & spiders, hoping they & their noise go away soon.

D0gknows how i'm gonna manage, some other time, to actually deal with them coming into my place, inside my home, for the necessary Doings, later once my #ISP advises me that #FttP is finally available for me if i want it [which i do, just not the peeps needed to get it]. Sigh.

Continued thread

@torproject same with #obfs4 bridges: there is no option to say like ports=80,443 or similar, which makes it cumbersome to get said bridges.

And trying to get places to #DontBlockTor that criminalize the use of #Tor is foolish at best.

Watching my neighbours ISP transition with keen interest.

Claimed 1GB down/750MB up, no caps, no modem rental for $50/mo?

Bell can stuff their latest price increase where the sun don't shine if things work out for him.

Funny thing. He's leaving Bell but it's a Bell tech performing the work. To chop $70/mo off what Bell charges him.

The canadian telco/ISP situation really, really sucks!

What's the thing you dislike the most about your local ISPs?

Look at us all communicating openly about the #coup. They're going to come for the communication. IDK, maybe they'll criminalize encrypted services, take over broadband, eliminate broadband, not sure. But I'm like 90% confident they're going to try to shut down any mass communication where we are able to talk about what they're doing and organize a response.