Jan R. Boehnke<p>#1/ First day of <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ISOQOL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ISOQOL</span></a> started with an interesting symposium on progress when optimizing the collection of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials.</p><p>Part of the discussion were desirable changes to the publication system when publishing expert consensus and guidance documents:</p><p>1) What does <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PeerReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>PeerReview</span></a> for such a document look like?</p><p>2) Static journal publications may not be the best format for such documents.</p><p>Both seem solvable, no? <br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HTD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>HTD</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NightshiftEditor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NightshiftEditor</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/RCT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RCT</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ScientificPublishing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ScientificPublishing</span></a></p>