Eph (they, them)<p>I'll be, <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/Zizek" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Zizek</span></a> does get there (see: <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/@Eph/110471776328493702" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">fediphilosophy.org/@Eph/110471</span><span class="invisible">776328493702</span></a>) (by referencing others that do), or at least very close to the <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/ExodusEarth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ExodusEarth</span></a> realization. He/they reframe idea of setting free that which we have come to know and love further, paraphrasing page xxi 'if we <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/love" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>love</span></a> the <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/earth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>earth</span></a>/#nature then for our sake, and the earth's/nature's sake, we must set <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/earth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>earth</span></a>/#nature free.' Zizek only needs to extend his reasoning a little further. Maybe he does elsewhere, we are still neophyte Zizekians.</p><p>It is natural to not consider exodus-ing earth to live in space. We prefer the idea of finding another planet to exploit. We tend to repress the idea of living in the vacuum of <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/space" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>space</span></a> in favor of another planet (diagnosed as planetary chauvinism by Isaac Asimov).</p><p>Or if we do empathically and compassionately realize we are no longer healthy for the earth and nature and we need to be removed, we may even contemplate something graver like self-extinction of ourselves, our species. </p><p>The <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/reason" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>reason</span></a> (from a gross amateur psychoanalyst) is the idea of living in space is akin to acknowledging the *das ding* of the 'real.' Here, we repress, or maybe more accurately, we are forbidden to acknowledge the existential truth that all existence resides precariously within a vacuous void of unpredictability and unknowing. Or represented more colloquially here by the real idea of living in the vacuum of space. Such an existence isn't imagined as comfortable or cozy for humans or any other earth mammalian species. It literally repulses us we think</p><p>We may think there must be another way. But if if we free our philosophy to reach its own conclusion and liberation, as recommended in The Sublime, the ACT will liberate the earth and humanity. We allow the truth to manifest philosophically without the subject, us (xxii).</p><p>This is hubris humans sacrificing themselves on the cross of earthly existence so that the earth can be reborn and man abolveres/sublamates to heaven, free of guilt, shame, and other fetters that had up til now invisibly enslaved them.</p><p>The most important thing to realize here, practically, as a first step, is that exodus-ing Earth is achievable now. We need not consider deep space, exploring the universe, etc. for now. Exiting Earth is about NEAR SPACE, to orbiting the earth, staying close to our mother but also weaned from her. This is the most profound, liberating, and loving thing we can do for ourselves as a species, but also for the sake of the Mother. It is, as Zizek refers to elsewhere in the preface, *absolvere*. </p><p>Collectively, our repressed guilt for being too good at what evolution made us, master exploiters, is destroying us psychoanalytically as it is destroying the earth and all life on it. Exodus Earth will not only exculpate our guilt but allow us to become angels in the sky for our Mother and all her other children.</p><p>The Sublime Subject of Ideology, Preface to the New Edition: The Idea's Constipation? Slavoj Zizek</p><p>p. xxi<br>"So, to pursue the rather tasteless metaphor, Hegel was not a sublimated coprophagist, as the usual notion of the dialectical process would lead us to believe. The matrix of the dialectical process is not that of excrementation externalization followed by a swallowing (reappropriation) of the external<br>ized content, but, on the contrary, of appropriation followed by the excremental move of dropping it, releasing it, letting it go. What this means is that one should not equate externalization with alienation. The externalization which concludes a cycle of dialectical process is not alienation, it is the highest point of disalienation: one really reconciles oneself with some objective content not when one still has to strive to master<br>and control it, but when one can afford the supreme sovereign gesture of releasing this content from oneself, of setting it free. Which is why, incidentally, and as some of the sharper interpreters have pointed out, far<br>from subduing nature totally to man, Hegel opens up an unexpected space for ecological awareness: for Hegel, the drive to exploit nature technologically is still a mark of man's finitude; in such an attitude, nature is<br>perceived as an external object, an opposing force to be dominated, while a philosopher, from his standpoint of Absolute Knowledge, experiences nature not as a threatening force to be controlled and dominated, but as something to be left to follow its inherent path."</p><p>End quote.</p><p>The realization that we must exit the Earth is traumatic and we will naturally protest and argue the conclusion and its cure and even compromise to going to another planet to exploit. The reasons for living in space are legion from free resources (energy) to space travel itself. The most dangerous, expensive, and resource intensive aspects of space travel is leaving and entering a planets atmosphere. But most profoundly and analytically, is that living in space, where we have nothing to exploit but each other, we have the possibility of truly coming to know ourselves and maybe evolve from Homo exploitus to becoming truly Homo sapiens.</p><p>One of frustrating aspects of <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/scifi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>scifi</span></a> is that human nature follows us where ever we go? It doesn't matter how we engineer society or utopias, our nature doesn't allow us to abide Eden. We think we know ourselves and we certainly do not know ourselves from an evolutionary psychology(analysis) perspective. Even worse than not knowing ourselves, we believe we have the will power to change. Our will power is not enough. The more we ignore our true biological and evolutionary natures, the more destructive we become. What we resist, persists. We are uber exploiters, it is the ground of our being (personal thesis). But we can change with wisdom. But not by just willing it, again, our will is not superhuman, but our drive to exploit is. An no amount of therapy can change it, but it can let us see it, for what it really is, an apparently inescapable ideology of nature and evolution. </p><p><a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/Mindfulness" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mindfulness</span></a> is becoming the preferred method of coming to terms with our true nature, Homo exploitus. Mindfulness creates both the space and time to be discerning ourselves before we act. It allows us to act compassionately and consciously. We don't change in that our true natures, Homo exploitus, is still there, but we can sidestep that reality and truly ACT in the Zizekian sense.</p><p>The biggest danger is ourselves. Even now, those at the forefront of <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/FreeSpace" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FreeSpace</span></a> aren't advocates of FreeSpace, but capitalists. </p><p>Need some inspiration? Try these music video youtubes:</p><p>Sting's 1985 (remastered) Video of "If You Love Somebody Set Them Free." Don't worry, your monitor is just fine. 4:05 minutes: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSGl3d4KOMk" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=LSGl3d4KOM</span><span class="invisible">k</span></a> </p><p>And </p><p>Peyton's 2009 vdeo (warning bright flashing bright club light) "A Higher Place." 3:56 minutes: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFfEOnNfD1o" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=YFfEOnNfD1</span><span class="invisible">o</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/Hegel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Hegel</span></a> <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/evolution" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>evolution</span></a> <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psychology</span></a> <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/psychoanalysis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psychoanalysis</span></a> <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/Lacan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Lacan</span></a> <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/space" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>space</span></a></p>