Paul Wermer, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@FaithinBones" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>FaithinBones</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petergleick" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>petergleick</span></a></span> <br>Agreed. And the <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/DNC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DNC</span></a> will never admit that their failure to address valid concern gave #47 his victory. Ignoring voter's concerns is inexcusable And the centrist <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/democrats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>democrats</span></a> have done that for too long.</p><p>I had many discussions with <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/pelosi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>pelosi</span></a> and <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Feinstein" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Feinstein</span></a> and <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/KamalaHarris" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>KamalaHarris</span></a> staffers telling me the concerns I heard while canvassing were wrong. The voters didn't agree</p>