shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

288
active users

#epistemology

3 posts2 participants0 posts today
Kagan MacTane (he/him)<p>Fraudsters can now do deepfake videos in real time. Just what we needed, another assault on our ability to trust in reality or the evidence of our senses.</p><p>Especially if you have any elderly relatives, it's worth setting up a code-phrase you can use to verify your identity.</p><p><a href="https://www.404media.co/the-age-of-realtime-deepfake-fraud-is-here/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">404media.co/the-age-of-realtim</span><span class="invisible">e-deepfake-fraud-is-here/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://wandering.shop/tags/deepfakes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>deepfakes</span></a> <a href="https://wandering.shop/tags/fraud" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fraud</span></a> <a href="https://wandering.shop/tags/WhatIsEvenRealAnymore" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WhatIsEvenRealAnymore</span></a> <a href="https://wandering.shop/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a></p>
Victoria Stuart 🇨🇦 🏳️‍⚧️<p>Why Everything in the Universe Turns More Complex | Quanta Magazine<br><a href="https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-everything-in-the-universe-turns-more-complex-20250402" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">quantamagazine.org/why-everyth</span><span class="invisible">ing-in-the-universe-turns-more-complex-20250402</span></a><br><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43677232" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4</span><span class="invisible">3677232</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/physics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>physics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/thermodynamics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>thermodynamics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/evolution" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>evolution</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/entropy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>entropy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/InformationTheory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>InformationTheory</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/InformationScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>InformationScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a></p>
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.<p>Jon Baron shared Peter Wakker's annotated bibliography of <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/decisionTheory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>decisionTheory</span></a></p><p>&gt; 9000 entries!</p><p>DocX <a href="http://personal.eur.nl/wakker/refs/webrfrncs.docx" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="ellipsis">personal.eur.nl/wakker/refs/we</span><span class="invisible">brfrncs.docx</span></a></p><p>PDF <a href="http://personal.eur.nl/wakker/refs/webrfrncs.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="ellipsis">personal.eur.nl/wakker/refs/we</span><span class="invisible">brfrncs.pdf</span></a></p><p>BibTeX (no annotations, I merged redundancies) <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/vbkki82h62ydq0fol1g8d/Decision-Theory.bib?rlkey=84m8zx3tyaa4uy6p0zptkybnx&amp;st=qx9myebb&amp;dl=0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">dropbox.com/scl/fi/vbkki82h62y</span><span class="invisible">dq0fol1g8d/Decision-Theory.bib?rlkey=84m8zx3tyaa4uy6p0zptkybnx&amp;st=qx9myebb&amp;dl=0</span></a></p><p><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/cogSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cogSci</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/decisionScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>decisionScience</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/philSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philSci</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/library" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>library</span></a></p>
T. T. Perry<p>"the level of confidence we in fact adopt must be determined by something that is irrelevant to the reliability of the testimony on which it’s based. After all, everything that is relevant to reliability is already included in the evidence."</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PhilosophyOfScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PhilSci</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Evidence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Evidence</span></a></p>
Mx. Luna Corbden<p>Out of curiosity, I went to see when in fact "heed" dropped off in usage, and as I suspected, it was during The Enlightenment, just before the Revolutionary War. It tried to pull up again in the mid-19th century, then the 20th century put the nail in it. Again, probably because of its connections to the concept of obedience. To understand someone meant you would obey them, and after awhile that didn't seem so fun. (I just picture some angry old father screaming at his children to heed him or else.) Our society is FAR less authoritarian than it once was. </p><p>(I saw a YouTube video on outsider artist Henry Darger last night, and jesus we have it good. I'd like to keep it that way and make things even better.)</p><p><a href="https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=heed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">wolframalpha.com/input?i=heed</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://defcon.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a><br><a href="https://defcon.social/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psychology</span></a><br><a href="https://defcon.social/tags/etymology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>etymology</span></a><br><a href="https://defcon.social/tags/English" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>English</span></a><br><a href="https://defcon.social/tags/AbuseCulture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AbuseCulture</span></a></p>
Mx. Luna Corbden<p>English conflates the concepts of "hear" and "understand." Many conflicts get nowhere because we use the common phrasing, "You're not listening to me!" or "You didn't hear me!" when what we really mean is, "You didn't get me, I want you to make sense of what I'm saying."</p><p>The process of comprehending what someone has said is different than hearing their words. How many times have you said, "You're not listening!" and they were in fact "listening" but not getting it? How many times have you said, "No I HEARD you?" when you did not, in fact, understand?</p><p>English used to have a snappy word for this: heed. To heed was to both hear AND to understand. And it also meant "obey" which might be why it fell out of favor (which itself reflects an interesting point of cultural values shift). We DO in fact conflate "listen" to obedience, sometimes, especially towards children. But not as much as once was.</p><p>The fact that all words mean multiple things, and that English has some issues with which things are conflated, can really influence how we think and interact. It's worth trying to unpack that. Then I start thinking towards how we can change English to be better.</p><p><a href="https://defcon.social/tags/AbuseCulture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AbuseCulture</span></a> <a href="https://defcon.social/tags/English" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>English</span></a> <a href="https://defcon.social/tags/etymology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>etymology</span></a> <a href="https://defcon.social/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psychology</span></a> <a href="https://defcon.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a></p>
Cristian Urbalejo Luna SW<p><a href="https://sciences.social/tags/introduction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>introduction</span></a> </p><p>Hello, I'm a Social Worker from Mexico City. I'm interested in studying my discipline from a <a href="https://sciences.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> and Technology Studies perspective. </p><p>Some other interests are: <a href="https://sciences.social/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a> of social sciences, <a href="https://sciences.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a>, scientific <a href="https://sciences.social/tags/practices" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>practices</span></a> and <a href="https://sciences.social/tags/community" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>community</span></a> social work.</p><p>I want to connect with other people in the social sciences and in the <a href="https://sciences.social/tags/humanities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>humanities</span></a> to broaden my network.</p><p>This is my dialnet webpage (in spanish): <a href="https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/autor?codigo=5344286" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/au</span><span class="invisible">tor?codigo=5344286</span></a></p><p>See you all around!!</p>
T. T. Perry<p>What is the characteristic wrong of testimonial injustice?<br>Richard Pettigrew, 2025</p><p>"When someone is in a position of power over you, you often need them to have accurate beliefs that only your testimony can reliably supply"</p><p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/pq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pq/pqaf034/8104779" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">academic.oup.com/pq/advance-ar</span><span class="invisible">ticle/doi/10.1093/pq/pqaf034/8104779</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Justice" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Justice</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a></p>
Androcat<p>If you understand Virtue Epistomology (VE), you cannot accept any LLM output as "information".</p><p>VE is an attempt to correct the various omniscience-problems inherent in classical epistemologies, which all to some extent require a person to know what the Truth is in order to evaluate if some statement is true.</p><p>VE prescribes that we should look to how the information was obtained, particularly in two ways:<br>1) Was the information obtained using a well-known method that is known to produce good results?<br>2) Does the method appear to have been applied correctly in this particular case?</p><p>LLM output always fails on pt1. An LLM will not look for the truth. It will just look for what is a probable combination of words. This means that an LLM is just as likely to combine a number of true statements in a way that is probable but false, as it is to combine them in a way that is probable and true. </p><p>LLMs only sample the probability of word combinations. It doesn't understand the input, and it doesn't understand its own output.</p><p>Only a damned fool would use it for anything, ever.</p><p><a href="https://toot.cat/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://toot.cat/tags/LLM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>LLM</span></a> <a href="https://toot.cat/tags/generativeAI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>generativeAI</span></a> <a href="https://toot.cat/tags/ArtificialIntelligence" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ArtificialIntelligence</span></a> <a href="https://toot.cat/tags/ArtificialStupidity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ArtificialStupidity</span></a> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/philosophy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>philosophy</span></a></span></p>
Johann Dr.EO<p>Recently, I got several opportunities to discuss the reproducibility crisis in science. To help discuss that complex topic, we need to agree on a vocabulary.</p><p>My favorite one has been published by Manuel López-Ibáñez, Juergen Branke and Luis Paquete, and is summarized in the attached diagram, which you can also find here: <a href="http://nojhan.net/tfd/vocabulary-of-reproducibility.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">http://</span><span class="ellipsis">nojhan.net/tfd/vocabulary-of-r</span><span class="invisible">eproducibility.html</span></a></p><p>It's good that this topic is not fading away, but is gaining traction. "Slowly, but surely", as we say in French.</p><p>If you want a high resolution suitable for impression, do not hesitate to ask!</p><p><a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/reproducibility" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>reproducibility</span></a> <a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://social.sciences.re/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a></p>
Ulrike Hahn<p>finally in print, the last puzzle piece in a decade of thinking about communication across social networks from the perspective of ideal rational agents: how do we factor in ‚dependence‘ - the fact that the same underlying evidence may, for example, reach us via multiple different reports, giving rise to double counting?</p><p>There is a strong intuition that multiple independent observations should carry more weight than dependent observations. But how much more? </p><p>We show that there is no (known) answer to this normative question in the general case. This renders a fundamental feature of human testimony unsolvable, meaning that acquiring knowledge via the testimony of others is much harder than typically assumed</p><p><a href="https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s11229-025-04969-w?sharing_token=T_qZZ-qagNeAgHYmwOsO4Pe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY7NNaNx5je-8CbqY3NQbXjm1PJgoB0Fw-IBoMYIKgSDlaiwownlR0py9XbHJBti1v6lLN7PlZ2uZJjf_SE6Z-Nwu8xISFeoc5h9Szl4tzerZtJWZwsR6CbwVDWSPlumzIw%3D" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007</span><span class="invisible">/s11229-025-04969-w?sharing_token=T_qZZ-qagNeAgHYmwOsO4Pe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY7NNaNx5je-8CbqY3NQbXjm1PJgoB0Fw-IBoMYIKgSDlaiwownlR0py9XbHJBti1v6lLN7PlZ2uZJjf_SE6Z-Nwu8xISFeoc5h9Szl4tzerZtJWZwsR6CbwVDWSPlumzIw%3D</span></a></p><p> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SocialNetworks" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SocialNetworks</span></a> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/philosophy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>philosophy</span></a></span></p>
M. Ní Sídach<p>Is religion the only foundation for morality?<br><a href="https://sfba.social/tags/DanMcClellan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DanMcClellan</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Culture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Culture</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Rhetoric" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Rhetoric</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Humanism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Humanism</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Religion" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Religion</span></a> <a href="https://sfba.social/tags/Christofascism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Christofascism</span></a> <br><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVN-DTiuwKc" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=IVN-DTiuwK</span><span class="invisible">c</span></a></p>
rk: could be an enum<p>Me: So if it’s a dog head on a human body, why does he have dog hands too?</p><p>10yo: He just does dad. He just does.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.well.com/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a></p>
Steam Powered Frisbee 🥏<p>This is one reason why I ignore mission statements when I make decisions.</p><p><a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/uncertainty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>uncertainty</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/complexity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>complexity</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/prediction" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>prediction</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/pragmatics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>pragmatics</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/simplicity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>simplicity</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/humility" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>humility</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/quote" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quote</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/quotes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quotes</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/quoteoftheday" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quoteoftheday</span></a> <a href="https://hear-me.social/tags/quotation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>quotation</span></a></p>
Friedrich Wilhelm Grafe<p><span class="h-card"><a href="https://mas.to/@tg9541" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>tg9541</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/bookstodon" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>bookstodon</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/philosophy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>philosophy</span></a></span> </p><p>yes, agree in a way. but do not see a win in playing off those two against each other, as later (after their common work PM) their work developed rather independently in more or less complementary areas, sometimes overlapping in <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PhilSci</span></a> topics.</p><p>E.g., if one focusses in <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>philosophy</span></a> first of all on questions of <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/ontology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ontology</span></a> (of science), ANW's process ontology will be much more impressive than the duplicating entities of logical constructs in say 'logical atomism' (which imop is a late and needless sin of BR). </p><p>If, on the other hand, the main focus is <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>logic</span></a> and logic related<br><a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> and/or <a href="https://fediphilosophy.org/tags/PhilMath" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PhilMath</span></a>, there is roughly anything deeper and more worth considering than say the theory of incomplete symbols; and perhaps no more careful and penetrating study than the ramified theory of types as developed from the circulus vitiosus argument, even when this theory was abandoned in the sequel for independent reasons.</p>
T. T. Perry<p>Patient-Centered Measurement: Ethics, Epistemology, and Dialogue in Contemporary Medicine<br>Leah M. McClimans (2024)</p><p>"patient-centered measures present a puzzle. And this puzzle has its source in the Janus-faced nature of medicine. How can measurement, which relies on standardization, represent patient perspectives, which, if not idiosyncratic are at least various and changeable?"</p><p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/56467" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">academic.oup.com/book/56467</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Philosophy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Philosophy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Medicine</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Ethics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Ethics</span></a></p>
T. T. Perry<p>The Enduring, Invisible Power of Blond<br>Tressie McMillan Cottom (2023)</p><p>"When people have outsize emotional reactions to benign inquiries about their self-evident beliefs, it is often an indicator that status is doing invisible work."</p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/19/opinion/the-enduring-invisible-power-of-blond.html?unlocked_article_code=1.oU4.ThVH.yG-JLZwcFveT" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nytimes.com/2023/01/19/opinion</span><span class="invisible">/the-enduring-invisible-power-of-blond.html?unlocked_article_code=1.oU4.ThVH.yG-JLZwcFveT</span></a></p><p>Archive: <a href="https://archive.ph/Ris6t" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">archive.ph/Ris6t</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Status" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Status</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Outrage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Outrage</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Dignity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Dignity</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Reactionary" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Reactionary</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Epistemology</span></a></p>
Victoria Stuart 🇨🇦 🏳️‍⚧️<p>How to Avoid Outrage Fatigue &amp; Tune In without Burning Out<br><a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/how-to-avoid-outrage-fatigue-and-tune-in-without-burning-out/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">scientificamerican.com/podcast</span><span class="invisible">/episode/how-to-avoid-outrage-fatigue-and-tune-in-without-burning-out/</span></a></p><p>Avoiding outrage fatigue while staying informed<br><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42949277" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4</span><span class="invisible">2949277</span></a></p><p>Comment: for more nuanced understanding read</p><p>2019: Communicating w. Memes: Consequences in Post-truth Civilization<br><a href="https://mastodon.social/@persagen/113437776461706493" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mastodon.social/@persagen/1134</span><span class="invisible">37776461706493</span></a><br><a href="https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781498551342/Communicating-with-Memes-Consequences-in-Post-truth-Civilization" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">rowman.com/ISBN/9781498551342/</span><span class="invisible">Communicating-with-Memes-Consequences-in-Post-truth-Civilization</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SocialMedia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SocialMedia</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rhetoric" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rhetoric</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/EchoChambers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>EchoChambers</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/polarization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>polarization</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/memes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>memes</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/GOP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GOP</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CultureWars" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CultureWars</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fascism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fascism</span></a></p>
Victoria Stuart 🇨🇦 🏳️‍⚧️<p>[cowardice; abrogation of duty] I’m a Doctor Appalled at Silence f. American Medical Association<br><a href="https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/im-a-doctor-and-im-appalled-at-the-silence-from-the-american-medical-association" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">motherjones.com/politics/2025/</span><span class="invisible">02/im-a-doctor-and-im-appalled-at-the-silence-from-the-american-medical-association</span></a></p><p>“Many physicians feel our values do not align w. the values of our advocacy organization” 🤔</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cowardice" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cowardice</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/abrogation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>abrogation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/abandonment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>abandonment</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sycophancy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>sycophancy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AMA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMA</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NIH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NIH</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NSF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NSF</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CDC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CDC</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/medicine" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>medicine</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/USpol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USpol</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/USlaw" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>USlaw</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fascism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fascism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/theocracy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>theocracy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/censorship" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>censorship</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PostTruthism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PostTruthism</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Christofascism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Christofascism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Catholicism" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Catholicism</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/transgenocide" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>transgenocide</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CriticalThinking" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CriticalThinking</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WomensRights" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>WomensRights</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ReproductiveRights" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ReproductiveRights</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SelfDetermination" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SelfDetermination</span></a></p>
Victoria Stuart 🇨🇦 🏳️‍⚧️<p>/1 ‘Despair is not an option.’ How scientists can help protect federal research<br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00290-1" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/d41586-025</span><span class="invisible">-00290-1</span></a></p><p>* U.S. government scientists must be clear-eyed &amp; continue to serve the public</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/BasicScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BasicScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/BasicResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BasicResearch</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/epistemology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>epistemology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/disease" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>disease</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/health" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>health</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PublicHealth" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PublicHealth</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NIH" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NIH</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/CDC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CDC</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NSF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NSF</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/academia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>academia</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/universities" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>universities</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenScience</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FreedomOfSpeech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FreedomOfSpeech</span></a></p>