Jan R. Boehnke<p>4/x One of the core ideas for me is the notion of aiming for an <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/EpistemicDialogue" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>EpistemicDialogue</span></a> as an approach to understand and meaningfully integrate the positions of different stakeholders.</p><p>“[…] epistemic dialogue is thus not to argue with others or to become self-satisfied with our own position, but rather to offer provocation in the form of questions so we can foreground and examine our own assumptions and values.”<br>McClimans (2024, p. 105)</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Measurement" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Measurement</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Gadamer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Gadamer</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PatientCentered" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PatientCentered</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PhilosophyOfScience</span></a></p>