shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

286
active users

#counterman

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@GottaLaff Lisa Graves on the Supreme Court's opinion on the Counterman V Colorado case.

"American people need to have 21st century rules to deal with 21st century cyberstalking, stalking, harassment and that type of threat. This is not about core 1st Amendment rights. People don't have the right to harass other people and threaten them."
#SupremeCourt #1stAmendment #stalking #CyberStalking #harassment #OnlineThreats #Facebook #Counterman Part 2

Continued thread

The Court decided on recklessness.

What exactly does recklessness entail? According to #Counterman, "in the threats context, it means the speaker is aware that others could regard his statements as threatening violence and delivers them anyway."

Kagan notes: "reckless defendants have done more than make a bad mistake. They have consciously accpeted a substantial risk of inflicting serious harm."

In #Counterman, #SupremeCourt had to balance the risk of chilling useful speech against the risk of letting people terrify & intimidate others w/o consequences

On the one hand, the lack of a subjective requirement for a true threat might chill speech that was rhetorical or joking or art bc speakers could not be sure what a court would conclude about reasonableness and stay silent

Continued thread

Prof Franks cont. 5: "And one of the many, many self-defeating things about this way of looking at the world or choosing not to see the world is to think that it's not going to come for you too at some point, right? That we're making this world a dangerous place for everyone. Everyone's less safe. .."
slateprivate.supportingcast.fm #slateplus link (no ads)
@Dahlialith #scotus #counterman #SupremeCourt #amicus #slate

Continued thread

Prof Franks cont. 4: "And as you say, there are people sitting in their homes who have really never faced any kind of challenging or deadly situation who have been so pumped full of propaganda and anger and resentment towards other people and suspicion that if someone knocks on their door and they don't recognize them, their first impulse is to get up and just shoot them. ..

@Dahlialith #scotus #counterman #stalking

Continued thread

Prof Franks cont 3: "And I would say not to any kind of extent that people who are not white and male and wealthy have to, but but they are having to face some sorts of criticism, and suddenly that has become the most important issue.

So yes, you can have a member of the most consequential court in the land raising the issue of hypersensitivity with straight faces and not thinking about how hypersensitive of a society we are. "

@Dahlialith #scotus #counterman #stalking

Continued thread

Prof Franks cont.: "..That up until this point, certain members of our society never had to be afraid—not only for their physical safety, but also didn't have to be afraid of being criticized. They didn't have to worry about being excluded. They didn't have to worry about being made fun of. Their integrity was never going to be challenged. And now, a little bit, they have to worry about that. .."
@Dahlialith #amicus #scotus #counterman #maryannfranks #slate

Continued thread

Professor Franks sobering response: "Oh, they get it. And it's it's it's operating exactly as it should—that this is not a bug, it's a feature. That is, if the underlying view here—not the one that is said in polite society—but the underlying view here is that fear is good, if it's happening to the right sorts of people and it's bad if it's happening to the wrong sorts of people, then really everything here is fairly consistent. Right? ..
#scotus #counterman
@Dahlialith