shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

290
active users

#cosmin

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Jan R. Boehnke<p>Read about the editors' choice papers, most downloaded, and interacted paper in "Quality of Life Research":<br><a href="https://www.isoqol.org/news-from-quality-of-life-research-112024/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">isoqol.org/news-from-quality-o</span><span class="invisible">f-life-research-112024/</span></a></p><p>The last annual update I will be involved in... 😅👋</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ISOQOL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ISOQOL</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HRQL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HRQL</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HealthEconomics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HealthEconomics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Psychometrics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Psychometrics</span></a><br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/EQ5D" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>EQ5D</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/COSMIN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>COSMIN</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PROMIS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PROMIS</span></a></p>
Jan R. Boehnke<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@TomJewell" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>TomJewell</span></a></span> </p><p>I argue that there is some understanding in the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/psychometrics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psychometrics</span></a> and professional communities that use <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TestScores" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TestScores</span></a> that evidence of quality is tentative as any statistical result.</p><p>And in my personal view, the different methodologies <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/COSMIN" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>COSMIN</span></a> has developed (e.g., <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/article/10.1</span><span class="invisible">007/s11136-018-1798-3</span></a>) or is currently pushing forward (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01994-5" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-019</span><span class="invisible">94-5</span></a>) are tools to aggregate available evidence exactly for this reason: each individual study and estimate offers an incomplete picture.</p>