shakedown.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A community for live music fans with roots in the jam scene. Shakedown Social is run by a team of volunteers (led by @clifff and @sethadam1) and funded by donations.

Administered by:

Server stats:

286
active users

#arkani

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Chuck Darwin<p><a href="https://c.im/tags/Figueiredo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Figueiredo</span></a> sensed the need for some new magic firsthand during the waning months of the pandemic. </p><p>She was struggling with a task that has challenged physicists for more than 50 years: </p><p>predicting what will happen when quantum particles collide. </p><p>In the late 1940s, it took a yearslong effort by three of the brightest minds of the post-war era <br>— Julian <a href="https://c.im/tags/Schwinger" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Schwinger</span></a>, Sin-Itiro <a href="https://c.im/tags/Tomonaga" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Tomonaga</span></a> and Richard <a href="https://c.im/tags/Feynman" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Feynman</span></a> <br>— to solve the problem for electrically charged particles. </p><p>Their eventual success would win them a Nobel Prize. </p><p>Feynman’s scheme was the most visual, so it came to dominate the way physicists think about the quantum world.</p><p>When two quantum particles come together, anything can happen. </p><p>They might merge into one, split into many, disappear or any sequence of the above. </p><p>And what will actually happen is, in some sense, a combination of all these and many other possibilities. </p><p>Feynman diagrams keep track of what might happen by stringing together lines representing particles’ trajectories through space-time. </p><p>Each diagram captures one possible sequence of subatomic events<br> and gives an equation for a number, <br>called an “amplitude,” <br>that represents the odds of that sequence taking place. </p><p>Add up enough amplitudes, physicists believe, and you get stones, buildings, trees and people. </p><p>“Almost everything in the world is a concatenation of that stuff happening over and over again,” Arkani-Hamed said. </p><p>“Just good old-fashioned things bouncing off each other.”</p><p>There’s a puzzling tension inherent in these amplitudes <br>— one that has vexed generations of quantum physicists going back to Feynman and Schwinger themselves. </p><p>One might spend hours at a chalkboard sketching Byzantine particle trajectories and evaluating fearsome formulas only to find that terms cancel out <br>and complicated expressions melt away to leave behind extremely simple answers <br>— in a classic example, <br>literally the number 1.</p><p>“The degree of effort required is tremendous,” Bourjaily said. </p><p>“And every single time, the prediction you make mocks you with its simplicity.”</p><p>Figueiredo had been wrestling with the strangeness of the situation when she attended a talk by <a href="https://c.im/tags/Arkani" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Arkani</span></a>-<a href="https://c.im/tags/Hamed" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Hamed</span></a>, <br>a leading theoretical physicist at the IAS who has spent years seeking a new way of getting the answers without Feynman diagrams. </p><p>She found her way to a series of his lectures on YouTube, in which he showed how <br>— in special cases <br>— one could jump straight to the amplitude of a certain outcome of a particle collision without worrying about how the particles moved through space.</p><p>Arkani-Hamed’s shortcuts, which involved reverse-engineering answers that satisfy certain fundamental logical requirements, <br>confirmed Figueiredo’s suspicions that alternative methods were out there. </p><p>“By asking for these very simple things you could just get the answer. </p><p>That was definitely striking,” she said.</p><p>She began to regularly make the half-hour walk from Princeton’s campus to the IAS to work with Arkani-Hamed, <br>a force of nature who runs on Diet Coke and an inexhaustible enthusiasm for physics.</p><p>Arkani-Hamed and his collaborators aspire to bring about a conceptual revolution of the sort that rocked physics in the late 1700s. </p><p>Joseph-Louis <a href="https://c.im/tags/Lagrange" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Lagrange</span></a> didn’t discover any forces or laws of nature, but every physicist knows his name. </p><p>He showed that you could predict the future without laboriously calculating actions and equal-and-opposite reactions in the style of Isaac Newton. </p><p>Instead, Lagrange learned to predict the path an object will follow by considering the energies that different paths require and identifying the easiest path. </p><p>Lagrange’s method, despite seeming like a mere mathematical convenience at the time, <br>loosened the straitjacket of Newton’s mechanistic view of the universe as a sequence of falling dominos. </p><p>Two centuries later, Lagrange’s approach provided Feynman with a more flexible framework that could accommodate the radical randomness of quantum mechanics.</p><p>Now many amplitudes researchers hope a reformulation of quantum physics will set the stage for the next physics revolution, <br>a theory of quantum gravity and the origin of space-time.</p>
Chuck Darwin<p>In the fall of 2022, a Princeton University graduate student named <a href="https://c.im/tags/Carolina" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Carolina</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Figueiredo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Figueiredo</span></a><br> stumbled onto a massive coincidence. </p><p>She calculated that collisions involving three different types of subatomic particles would all produce the same wreckage. </p><p>“They are very different [particle] theories. <br>There’s no reason for them to be connected,” Figueiredo said.</p><p>The coincidence soon revealed itself to be a conspiracy: </p><p>The theories describing the three types of particles were, <br>when viewed from the right perspective, <br>essentially one. </p><p>The conspiracy, Figueiredo and her colleagues realized, stems from the existence of a hidden structure, <br>one that could potentially simplify the complex business of understanding what’s going on at the base level of reality.</p><p>For nearly two decades, Figueiredo’s doctoral advisor, <a href="https://c.im/tags/Nima" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Nima</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Arkani" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Arkani</span></a>-<a href="https://c.im/tags/Hamed" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Hamed</span></a><br>has been leading a hunt for a new way of doing physics. </p><p>Many physicists believe they’ve reached the end of the road when it comes to conceptualizing reality in terms of quantum events that play out in space and time. </p><p>Such language can’t easily describe the beginning of the universe, for instance, <br>when the space-time fabric likely didn’t exist in its current form. </p><p>Arkani-Hamed therefore suspects that the usual notion of quantum particles moving and interacting in space-time is an approximation of deeper, more abstract concepts, <br>which, if found, could serve as a better language for talking about quantum gravity and the origin of the universe.</p><p>A major development came in 2013, when Arkani-Hamed and his student at the time, <a href="https://c.im/tags/Jaroslav" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Jaroslav</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Trnka" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Trnka</span></a>, discovered a jewel-like geometric object that forecasts the outcome of certain particle interactions. </p><p>They called the object the “<a href="https://c.im/tags/amplituhedron" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>amplituhedron</span></a>.” </p><p>However, the object didn’t apply to the particles of the real world. <br>So Arkani-Hamed and his colleagues sought more such objects that would</p><p>Figueiredo’s conspiracy is another manifestation of abstract geometric structure that seems to underlie particle physics.</p><p>“The overall program is inching closer to Nima’s long-term dream of space-time and quantum mechanics emerging from a new set of principles,” <br>said Sebastian Mizera, a physicist who studies amplitudes at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, but was not involved in the recent work.</p><p>Like the amplituhedron, the new geometrical method, <br>known as “<a href="https://c.im/tags/surfaceology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>surfaceology</span></a>,” streamlines quantum physics by sidestepping the traditional approach, <br>which is to track the countless ways particles can move through space-time using “Feynman diagrams.” </p><p>These depictions of particles’ possible collisions and trajectories translate into complicated equations. </p><p>With surfaceology, physicists can get the same result more directly.</p><p>“It provides a natural framework, or a bookkeeping mechanism, <br>to assemble very large numbers of Feynman diagrams,” said <a href="https://c.im/tags/Marcus" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Marcus</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Spradlin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Spradlin</span></a>, a physicist at Brown University who has been picking up the new tools of surfaceology. </p><p>“There’s an exponential compactification in information.”</p><p>Unlike the amplituhedron, <br>which required exotic particles to provide a balance known as supersymmetry, <br>surfaceology applies to more realistic, nonsupersymmetric particles. </p><p>“It’s completely agnostic. It couldn’t care less about supersymmetry,” Spradlin said. </p><p>“For some people, me included, I think that’s really been quite a surprise.”</p><p>The question now is whether this new, more primitive geometric approach to particle physics will allow theoretical physicists to slip the confines of space and time altogether.</p><p>“We needed to find some magic, and maybe this is it,” said <a href="https://c.im/tags/Jacob" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Jacob</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Bourjaily" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Bourjaily</span></a>, a physicist at Pennsylvania State University. </p><p>“Whether it’s going to get rid of space-time, I don’t know. <br>But it’s the first time I’ve seen a door.”</p><p><a href="https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-reveal-a-quantum-geometry-that-exists-outside-of-space-and-time-20240925/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">quantamagazine.org/physicists-</span><span class="invisible">reveal-a-quantum-geometry-that-exists-outside-of-space-and-time-20240925/</span></a></p>